Grassroots Actions for Peace

Founded Concord, MA 1991

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world;
Indeed it's the only thing that ever has."
 - Margaret Mead

 
Our Current
Grassroots Campaigns
Depleted Uranium Campaigns Local, National, International

Bioweapons Laboratories in MA



United States Department of Peace



Find on GRAP:

 
 

Grassroots Actions for Peace Archive Page

Announcements   |   Actions   |   Latest Articles   |   PTP

Announcements

04 Dec 2007, Alliance for Democracy

AfD office, 760 Main St., Waltham, at 7:30 p.m.

Boston area Alliance for Democracy activists will meet again this Tuesday, 4 December, at the AfD office, 760 Main St., Waltham, at 7:30 p.m. (behind the stone Episcopal church, about midway on Route 20, between the Moody Street intersection on the East and MacDonalds on the West). Our main agenda item will be whether and how to work at/with Boston 911 Truth's Boston Tea Party forums at Faneuil Hall, Boston Common rally, harbor demonstration, and Union St. tavern gathering on 15-16 December. (See attachment above for background and details.) We will see a few minute's video segment of controlled demolition of World Trade Center building 7 on 9/11, and new evidence of the Bush family's involvement in a corporate coup attempt on the US government in 1934. Also on our agenda are reports on Democracy School at the AfD convention and elsewhere, recent film showings on Exxon-Mobil and on the Iraq war, and other concerns.

*****************************************************************

TUESDAY, NOV. 27, 7-9 p.m.: EXCLUSIVE FILM SHOWING & DISCUSSION:

with Tom Jackson, director and
Ross Gelbspan, renowned climate crisis journalist and author
OUT OF BALANCE:
Exxon Mobil's Impact on Climate Change

TUESDAY, NOV. 27, 7-9 p.m.
Harvey Wheeler Community Center
1276 Main Street, West Concord
(corner of Main and Church Streets)

The Earth's climate has been pushed dangerously "out of balance" by reliance on fossil fuels. This film depicts the powerful influence on national energy and environmental policy wielded by ExxonMobil, but also offers hope about what we can do.

Please join the First Parish of Concord Green Sanctuary Committee and North Bridge Alliance for Democracy as they sponsor this provocative showing and discussion. For information please call (978) 369-1181.

Read more at this web page

*****************************************************************
*****************************************************************

Wednesday, NOV. 28, 7 p.m.: EXCLUSIVE FILM SHOWING presented by the Watertown Citizens for Environmental Safety

Why We Fight
    Film: Wednesday, November 28, 7:00 pm
    Watertown Free Public Library
    123 Main Street, Watertown

This provocative documentary surveys a half-century of military conflicts, asking how, and answering why, a nation of, by and for the people has become the savings-and-loan of a government system whose survival depends on an Orwellian state of constant war.  WCES web page

*****************************************************************

Campaign Reform - State Rep. Jamie Eldridge - Wednesday, October 24, 8:15 PM

This will not be an any ordinary Jamie Eldridge speech. He will describe his beginnings in politics as the only Clean Elections candidate elected in Massachusetts history, along with a discussion of why Clean Elections did not succeed in the Bay State even though it has become the conventional way to run for public office in some states, such as Maine and Arizona. Jamie will also talk about current state and federal efforts to decrease the role of money in elections.

Event Co-Sponsored by Brandeis Democrats & Democracy Matters
Contact: David Emer (david@deisdems.com or 978-549-1694)
The presesentation will be in the Multipurpose Room at the Shapiro Campus Center.
Brandeis University. 415 South St., Waltham, MA, Multipurpose Room
Directions: http://www.brandeis.edu/overview/directions.html

Saturday Oct 20th
John Hope Franklin, Distinguished Historian, Winner of Concord's award for Contributions to US History, the President's Metal of Freedom and Chairman of President Clinton's 'Task Force on Race'.


Mr. Franklin speak this Saturday night, Oct 20, 7:30 PM at the Trinitarian Congressional Church, 54 Walden Street in Concord Center.
He is the author of From Slavery to Freedom that has gone through 7 editions, worked with on the brief with Thurgood Marshall for the Brown vs. Board of Education case. He surmounted barriers to become professor at U. Chicago and Duke. Please come and enjoy his presentation, tell your friends, let us fill the building. See http://www.triconchurch.org for directions
Grassroots Actions for Peace Celebration Party
Friday, February 16th, 2007

The party is from 7:00 – 9:30, at the First Parish Church in Concord

We hope this will be a really fun event, encouraging, and a chance for people to get acquainted with folks in other grassroots groups in the Greater Boston area working to end the Iraq War.

Please RSVP, see notice on left side of this page, thank you.
Directions to the party (pdf).

Healing the Holy Land: Two Men, A Muslim and a Jew, Talk About Their Work in Jerusalem and elsewhere: Healing the Israeli-Palestine Divide.

Monday, 19 Nov 2007, 7 pm Doors open, Program begins at 7:30pm

On Monday, November 19th, we will have the rare opportunity and great honor to hear Eliyahu McLean and Sheikh Ghassan Manasra, Muslim and Jewish peacemakers, present a program about their important work. They both live in Jerusalem and this is their first visit to the Boston area. Sheikh Ghassan Manasra is the director of Amwar-il Salaam, a Muslim peace center in Nazareth. Eliyahu McLean is the director of Jerusalem Peacemakers. They are working in Israel, Palestine, and worldwide with religious leaders, peace activists, and within Jewish, Muslim, Christian and Druze communities to promote understanding, interfaith dialogue, and friendship.

They will share with us short videos, music, and describe their work on healing the Israeli-Palestine divide in Jerusalem and elsewhere throughout the Holy Land.

A suggested $10 donation is requested to support their important peace work. Checks can be made out to the Center for Religious Tolerance (501c3), to benefit Jerusalem Peacemakers, of which Eliyahu is the director and a founding member. This event is co-sponsored by the (town of) Harvard Unitarian Universalist Church's Social Responsibility Committee and First Parish Church of Stow and Acton's Middle East Forum and Social Action Committee and the Nashoba Valley Peace and Justice group.

The program will be held in the Sanctuary of the (town of) Harvard Unitarian Universalist Church, Harvard Common, Harvard, MA. (Route 2 to Exit 38A/Route 110/111/, South, for 1.5 miles) www.uuharvard.org

Doors open at 7:00 pm, the program begins at 7:30pm. Refreshments will follow. We hope as many people as possible come to learn about and support these courageous, wise, and compassionate men and their efforts to bring about peace in the Holy Land. Please join us."

thanks, pat westwater-jong , NVPJ


MARCH ON WASHINGTON
January 27, 2007

Join United for Peace and Justice in a massive march on Washington, D.C., on Sat., January 27, to call on Congress to take immediate action to end the war.

On Mon., January 29, we'll take our message directly to individual members of the Congress during our Congressional Education Day. Get a flyer at Justice With Peace

Peace March in DC with Salt Lake City Mayor 1/27/07
Veterans for Peace Head Speaks at DC Peace March 1/27/07
Peace March in DC with Colonel Anne 1/27/07

Peace March in DC with Sean Penn 1/27/07
Peace March in DC with Jane Fonda 1/27/07
2 - Peace March in DC with Jane Fonda 1/27/07
3 - Peace March in DC with Jane Fonda 1/27/07
Peace March in DC with Susan Sarandon 1/27/07
1 - Peace March in DC with Tim Robbins 1/27/07
2 - Peace March in DC with Tim Robbins 1/27/07

Peace March in DC 1/27/07 - The March Begins!

Still Photos on the Mall at the Capitol (18)
Local Rally to End the War
Saturday, January 27, 2007 11 am to 12 noon
Location: In front of Martin Meehan's office, 11 Kearney Square, Lowell, MA

Join us in a local rally in Lowell in support of the Jan. 27 National Peace March in Washington, D.C. organized by United for Peace and Justice..

Get Rally Flyer here Local Rally to End the War
(Note: Please give the pdf file a few momements to fully load)

The Great Turning: from Empire to Earth Community

by David Korten
Saturday, March 24th at 7:30 pm

Discussion and reception afterwards at:
The First Unitarian Society in Newton, MA  1326 Washington St., West Newton
  • David Korten's classic bestseller, When Corporations Rule the World, was one of the first books to articulate the destructive and oppressive nature of the global corporate economy.
  • Now, ten years later, Korten shows that the problem runs deeper than corporate domination -- with far greater consequences.
For more information, visit www.fusn.org or call (617) 527-3203
See also Discussion Guide (pdf)
Watch a two minute introduction on You Tube

9/11: Press for Truth presented as a public service by MediaChannel.org

As a balance to the much-maligned ABC/Disney mini-series 'Path to 9/11,' MediaChannel offers this online screening of '9/11: Press for Truth' in its entirety (124 mins).

Based on Paul Thompson's Complete 9/11 Timeline and the true story of how some family members fought a relentless, emotional battle (against the will of the Whitehouse) for an independent investigation of the attacks. The film features never-before-seen interviews and stitches together overlooked news clips, buried stories, and government press conferences to reveal a pattern of official lies, deception and spin. As a result, a very different picture of 9/11 emerges, one that raises new and more pressing questions. This film does not posit a conspiracy theory: it systematically reviews accounts, quotes, official Whitehouse statements and catalogs the many disturbing contradictions. After watching this film, it is simply impossible to believe the 'official story.' Please watch this important film...  This is the full one-hour and twenty-four minute uncut version which recently premiered in Manhattan.  See [ video ]


Revoke the Operating License of the VT Yankee Nuclear Reactor

12PM, October 16th, 2006 Entergy Headquarters, Brattleboro, VT

Join Bread and Puppet parade through Brattleboro
Start at the Brattleboro Memorial Hospital at 9:00 A.M. ( exit 1 off I-91)
Walk through town to Entergy headquarters on Old Ferry Rd., N. Brattleboro (exit 3 off I-91)
Bread and Puppet Band and performance at 11:30 A.M. at Entergy headquarters on Old Ferry Road, N. Brattleboro  See poster 


What They Tested In 2000 and Practiced In 2004 They Are Preparing To Roll Out In 2008, Big-Time

Add Ohio’s 103,660 “spoiled” votes to the 33,998 provisional ballots rejected to the 15,519 absentee ballots never counted to the several thousand lost due to voting machine “shortages,” mix in the race of the voters who lost their votes and you have a recipe to cook an election, no matter who the voters choose.

Is the fix in for '08? And what can we do about it? Find out when Greg Palast, "America's best investigative journalist" and author of Armed Madhouse and The Best Democracy Money Can Buy speaks Thursday, September 28, 7:30 p.m., at the First Parish Church, 3 Church St., Harvard Square, Cambridge.   See [ Event Description ]

Picture Source Url
On Message by Andy Wahl, originally published in 1993.
Global Warming - A Little Help Here, originally published in 1993 by National Academy of Sciences
 

America In Hock


Jon Stewart, The War on TERRORble Diseases   Video-WMP Video-QT
Total Information Awareness
Total Information Awareness by Andrew Wahl

Total "Terrorism" Information Awareness (TIA)



Actions

The House of Representatives will be voting on HR 333 on Tuesday, 6 Nov 2007
This bill calls for the impeachment of the vice president for several of his law breaking actions. Almost certainly, immediately after the bill is introducted, a call will be made to table the measure; To postpone the bill to a later date.

Call, write, fax, and email your representative today, tomorrow and on Tuesday. Tell him or her to vote against tabling the resolution. Let the world know that Americans care. Remember that none of the 10 Massachusetts delegation members have co-sponsored HR 333

Our representatives need to know that they are bound by the Constitution to follow through on their oath 'To preserve and protect the Constitution'.

A couple of talking points when speaking with your representative:
--In answer to "we won't get anything else done," Say: "Impeachment trumps everything. It's the only way to get out of Iraq, and as long as we're spending that kind of money in Iraq there is no money for anything else, healthcare, education, nothing. Besides, the Founders made your duty clear, the Constitution comes first."" Also: "What does it matter what laws get passed? Bush can just ignore them with signing statements. We're talking about the rule of law itself on the line."

--In answer to "It will cost us the 2008 presidential election," Say: "Besides some parts of your job being above short-term politics, did impeaching Nixon cost Democrats the next presidency? No, we got Carter. Did impeaching Clinton cost the Republicans? No, Bush won. So you've got it backwards."

Kucinich to Force Vote on Impeachment of Cheney

Posted November 3rd, 2007 by ralphlopez
It used to be that impeachment was news. So why haven't I seen anything about Congressman Dennis Kucinich's plan to force a vote in Congress on articles of impeachment against Dick Cheney this Tuesday? With 54 percent of Americans in favor of impeaching the vice president, according to an American Research Group survey last July, it would seem that the ball certainly is in play. Kucinich's House Resolution 333 will most likely face an opposing motion to table it, which in legislative-speak means put aside for another day. But that's not the point. This will be the first time congressmen will be put on the record with an "aye" or a "nay" on impeachment proceedings.


Monday, March 12 is the big day on which the UFPJ wants us to call our representatives in Congress.

Use this toll-free number 888-851-1879, or the regular Capitol Switchboard number, 202-224-3121, to make your call(s).

Ask to be connected to your Representative, and also to staff for Speaker Nancy Pelosi who is pushing for approval of the appropriation with certain conditions. Tell them to oppose this supplemental appropriation, that enough people have died, that the Administration needs to devote all remaining funds to withdrawal. Without the extra funds, they will have no choice.
"Knowledge is the Beginning" - Newton Dialogs on Peace and War
Newton Dialogs for Peace and War is holding the following event on 11 June 2007.

On Monday, 11 June 2007 at 7:00pm, Newton Dialogues on Peace and War proudly presents the documentary film "Knowledge is the Beginning". This is an inspriring and challaging film about the successful founding -- by Daniel Barenboim and Edward Said -- of an orchestra made up of you musicians from Isreal, Palestine, and other Middle East coutnries. "Music is the language of peace". "A metaphor for what could be achieved there." At the Newton Main Library, 330 Homer Street, Newton Center, MA 02459. Visit www.newtondialogues.org for more information.

North Yorkshire, England

10 May 2006, by Ian Herbert in the Independent / UK

UK Veteran Protesters Face Jail under New Anti-Terror Laws. .... the first individuals to face charges under a little-noticed clause in the Government's Serious Organised Crime and Police Act, which came into force last month.   Link


Washington, DC

500,0001 antiwar activists packed downtown Washington yesterday [09/24/2005] and marched past the White House in the largest show of antiwar sentiment in the nation's capitol since the conflict in Iraq began.



See Great Day in the Morning1, PDA Grassroots Strategy Day Report
By William Rivers Pitt (seek down 2/3 page)

WashingtonPost Article
Also BellaCiao Article
Tomgram: Voices from the Frontlines of Protest, Washington D.C.
TruthOut Multimedia Page
Windchime Walker's Journal

House Resolution - H.J.RES.55 / H.RES.543

Title: Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 55) requiring the President to develop and implement a plan for the withdrawal of United States Armed Forces from Iraq.

Sponsor: Rep Abercrombie, Neil [HI-1] (introduced 6/16/2005)
Cosponsors ( 68   69 )
Related Bills: H.RES.543 Latest Major Action: 6/16/2005 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

House Concurrent Resolution - H.CON.RES.197

Title: Declaring that it is the policy of the United States not to enter into any base agreement with the Government of Iraq that would lead to a permanent United States military presence in Iraq.


No Permanent Bases: Passed Both Houses, Removed in Conference Committee

9 June 2006, by David Swanson After Downing Street

When the House and the Senate pass similar but not identical bills, they create a conference committee to work out the differences. When they both passed amendments to the "emergency supplemental" spending bill stipulating that none of the money could be used to build permanent bases in Iraq, the conference committee, behind closed doors this week, resolved that non-difference by deleting it.  [ read more ]



Sponsor: Rep Lee, Barbara [CA-9] (introduced 6/30/2005) )
Cosponsors ( 81   86 )
Committees: House Rules
Latest Major Action: Latest Major Action: 6/30/2005 Referred to House committee.
Status: Referred to the House Committee on International Relations.
Search on H.CON.RES.197 at the Thomas web site, also see the bill's GPO entry (pdf).

See also,

House Investigation - H.RES.635

Creating a select committee to investigate the Administration's intent to go to war before congressional authorization, manipulation of pre-war intelligence, encouraging and countenancing torture, retaliating against critics, and to make recommendations regarding grounds for possible impeachment.

Sponsor: Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14] (introduced 12/18/2005)
Cosponsors ( 36   37 )
Committees: House Rules
Latest Major Action: 12/18/2005 Referred to House committee.
Status: Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Search on H.RES.635 at the Thomas web site, also see the bill's GPO entry (pdf).

36 US House Reps Want Bush Impeachment Probe

by Matthew Cardinale, Atlanta Progressive News.Com

(APN) Atlanta -- 36 US House Representatives have signed on as sponsors or co-sponsors of H. Res 635, which would create a Select Committee to look into the grounds for recommending President Bush’s impeachment, Atlanta Progressive News has learned.
... An Atlanta Progressive News analysis has found that, interestingly, 29 of the 36 total co-sponsors are members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. However, only 29 of the 62 members of the Caucus have signed on.... [ read more ]
  Vermont Democrats Call for Bush Impeachment, April 8, 2006
Democratic state committees in Wisconsin, New Mexico, Nevada and North Carolina have taken similar steps.

House Censure - H.RES.636

Censuring President George W. Bush for failing to respond to requests for information concerning allegations that he and others in his Administration misled Congress and the American people regarding the decision to go to war in Iraq, misstated and manipulated intelligence information regarding the justification for the war, countenanced torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment of persons in Iraq, and permitted inappropriate retaliation against critics of his Administration, for failing to adequately account for specific misstatements he made regarding the war, and for failing to comply with Executive Order 12958.

Sponsor: Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14] (introduced 12/18/2005)
Cosponsors ( 17   17 )
Committees: House Judiciary
Latest Major Action: 12/18/2005 Referred to House committee.
Status: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Search on H.RES.636 at the Thomas web site, also see the bill's GPO entry (pdf).


Senate Censure - S.RES.398

Relating to the censure of George W. Bush.
Resolved, That the United States Senate does hereby censure George W. Bush, President of the United States, and does condemn his unlawful authorization of wiretaps of Americans within the United States without obtaining the court orders required by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, his failure to inform the full congressional intelligence committees as required by law, and his efforts to mislead the American people about the authorities relied upon by his Administration to conduct wiretaps and about the legality of the program.

Sponsor: Senator Russell D. Feingold, [WI] (introduced 3/13/2006)
Cosponsors ( 2   3 )
Committees:
Latest Major Action:
Status: (Introduced in Senate)
Search on S.RES.398 at the Thomas web site, also see the bill's GPO entry (pdf).

In Historic Move, Feingold Introduces Resolution to Censure President Bush, March 14th, 2006   See article on Democracy Now.

Senator Sets Hearing on Censure of Bush, The New York Times, March 25, 2006
Washington - The Senate Judiciary Committee has set a hearing for next Friday [March 31] on the call by Senator Russell D. Feingold, Democrat of Wisconsin, to censure President Bush for his approval of a program to allow electronic eavesdropping without warrants.

Senator Arlen Specter, the Pennsylvania Republican who is chairman of the panel, said he had decided to schedule the session after Mr. Feingold, in a television interview, pressed for hearings on the censure proposal.  [ read more ]

House Censure - H.RES.637

Censuring Vice President Richard B. Cheney for failing to respond to requests for information concerning allegations that he and others in the Administration misled Congress and the American people regarding the decision to go to war in Iraq, misstated and manipulated intelligence information regarding the justification for the war, countenanced torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment of persons in Iraq, and permitted inappropriate retaliation against critics of the Administration and for failing to adequately account for specific misstatements he made regarding the war.

Sponsor: Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14] (introduced 12/18/2005)
Cosponsors ( 18   19 )
Committees: House Judiciary
Latest Major Action: 12/18/2005 Referred to House committee.
Status: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Search on H.RES.637 at the Thomas web site, also see the bill's GPO entry (pdf).

End the War in Iraq Act of 2005 - H.R. 4232

End the War in Iraq Act of 2005
To prohibit the use of funds to deploy United States Armed Forces to Iraq.
Sponsor: Rep. Jim McGovern, [MA-3] (introduced 11/4/2005)
Cosponsors ( 17   18 ) - Rep Towns, Edolphus [NY-10] - 5/23/2006 Committees:
Latest Major Action:
Status: (Introduced in House)
Search on H.R.4232 at the Thomas web site, also see the bill's GPO entry (pdf).

See also:

Please contact your senator or representative and ask that they cosponsor
the following bills in the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives:

Special Thanks ( 109th Congress )to
Representative Rothman for his support of H.J.Res. 55; 69th cosponsor
Representative DeLauro for her for their support of H.CON.RES.197; 86th cosponsor
Representative Rothman for his support of H.Res.635; 37th cosponsor
Representative Rothman for his support of H.Res.636; 18th cosponsor
Representative Rothman for his support for H.Res.637; 19th cosponsor
Representative Farr for his recent support of H.R.4232; 18th cosponsor
Senator Kerry for his support of S.R.398; 3rd cosponsor
Please contact your senators or representative
and ask that they co-sponsor the following three (3) bills:
H.R. 202, H.R. 2410, and H.R. 4184
all related to Depleted Uranium and its effects.
  • Depleted Uranium Screening and Testing Act of 2005 - H.R. 202
  • Depleted Uranium Munitions Study Act - H.R. 2410
  • You Were There, You Get Care Act of 2005 - H.R. 4184
  • See our Depleted Uranium page for details.

UFPJ Legislative Action Network

2 Jun 2006, Legislative Update

1. Network Conference Call: Monday June 5
2. National Call-in Day: June 7
3. Sen. Boxer introduces Resolution to bring troops home
4. Rep. Lee introduces Resolution of Inquiry on Ira

1. Network Conference Call
Monday, June 5, 2006
UFPJ Legislative Action Network Conference Call
8:30 p.m. (eastern time)
605-990-0200
code: 505727
1. Debrief and report backs from May 22 Congressional Education Day (15 min.)
2. Proposal for nationally-coordinated in-district lobby week in early fall (10 min.)
3. Strategy for ensuring an open debate on Iraq (10 min.)
4. Update on legislative initiatives on Iran (15 min.)
Please RSVP with your name, org., city and state by hitting 'reply' (NOT 'reply all') to this email

2. National Call-in Day on discharge petition Over a dozen national peace organizations are joining with UFPJ in a national call-in day on the discharge petition: AfterDowningStreet.org, American Friends Service Committee, Code Pink, DC for Democracy, Democracy Rising, Democrats.com, Maryknoll Office of Global Concerns, NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby, Peace Action, Progressive Democrats of America, 20/20 Vision, Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations, Win Without War

Here is a draft alert, you can alter it as you see fit, but make sure that it is clear that calls should support the discharge petition for an open debate on Iraq (H.Res543). UFPJ will send a press advisory about the call-in day, so please let me know if your organization or network will be participating! I will forward the press advisory on Monday so you can do local media work.

Subject: Call for debate on Iraq NOW!

National Call-In Day June 7
Call your Representative
202-224-3121

An open debate on Iraq is OVERDUE!

Americans want their sons and daughters home. Children want their mothers and fathers home. The Iraqis want their nation back. Most of the troops think they should leave in the next 6 months. These are the compelling majority opinions that must be addressed. Facing this is a moral and non-partisan challenge.

But, after more than three years, $300 billion and the death of over one hundred thousand Iraqis and nearly 2,500 American soldiers, Congress still refuses to debate real alternatives to the President's stay-the-course policy. It is a policy that over 80% of Iraqis, more than 70% of U.S. soldiers stationed in Iraq and a majority of Americans say is a failure.

As a people who seek peace and justice, we have a unique opportunity to demand that Congress stop passing the buck. So far, 122 members of the House of Representatives have signed a 'discharge petition' calling for immediate debate and vote on ALL alternatives to the policy of open-ended occupation of Iraq (including an immediate withdrawal of all U.S. troops). All we need is 96 more members to sign the petition for debate to begin. We need your help!

Call your U.S. Representative on June 7th. Ask your Representative to sign H.Res. 543 OR thank them if they have already signed and ask them to ask a colleague to sign H.Res. 543.

Here are lists of those who have and have not signed:
http://www.openiraqdebate.com/inner/roll-call.html

The pressure we are applying is already having an impact. There have been news reports that some members of Congress, hoping to dodge a real discussion about Iraq, will offer a tightly-controlled debate framed by supporters of the war. This alternative is clearly and election-year effort to sell the war to the public, rather than address the failed policy and the need to bring the troops home. This alternative won't allow members who oppose the war to offer plans to bring the occupation to an end.

Tell your Congress Member that you demand to see a debate with an "open rule," meaning that any amendments can be introduced, debated, and voted on. The surest route to that debate is for them to sign the discharge petition and ask their colleagues to do the same.

Call 202-224-3121, give the operator your Representative's name or go to power search on Congress for the local district office.

Message for NON-signers of H.Res.543Message for signers of H.Res. 543
As your constituent, I ask you to sign onto H.Res. 543, a "discharge petition" that calls for open and honest debate on Iraq and consideration of ALL alternatives to the policy of open ended occupation of Iraq. I will not be satisfied with a limited debate that prohibits the introduction of real alternatives to the President's failed policy in Iraq. It is time to show strong leadership to bring peace in the region. As your constituent, I want to thank you for signing H.Res. 543. So important is 17 hours of full and honest debate and consideration of ALL alternatives to the policy of open ended occupation of Iraq that I ask you to ask one of your NON-signing colleagues to sign H.Res. 543. This is one important step in building peace in Iraq and throughout the region.

Help change the course in Iraq. It is an historic opportunity for member of Congress to offer alternatives to WAR WITHOUT END in Iraq. See Open Iraq Debate for more information about H.Res. 543. You can check the House Clerk's site daily for new signatures.

3. Boxer Resolution on Iraq (companion to Murtha resolution in House) This resolution doesn't have a bill number yet. I like the "whereas clauses" -- choose one or two and turn it into a letter to the editor!

To spur a political solution in Iraq and encourage Iraqis to provide for their own security through the redeployment of U.S. forces.

JOINT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Armed Forces of the United States have served bravely in Iraq and deserve the heartfelt support of our nation;

Whereas more than 2,450 U.S. military personnel have been killed and more than 18,000 wounded in support of military operations in Iraq;

Whereas more than 200 coalition personnel have been killed in support of military operations in Iraq;

Whereas it is estimated that at least 40,000 Iraqis have been killed during the military intervention in Iraq;

Whereas much of the intelligence used by the Bush Administration to justify the use of force in Iraq was either exaggerated or simply wrong;

Whereas President George W. Bush stated that the mission in Iraq was to rid it of weapons of mass destruction;

Whereas weapons of mass destruction have not been found;

Whereas President Bush then stated that the mission in Iraq was to end the regime of Saddam Hussein and free the Iraqi people;

Whereas Saddam Hussein is in custody and standing trial for crimes against humanity;

Whereas President Bush then stated that the mission in Iraq was to establish a free, self-governing, and democratic Iraq;

Whereas Iraq elected its first permanent government on December 15, 2005, and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's cabinet has been approved by the Iraqi Parliament concluding the country's transition to full political sovereignty;

Whereas President Bush then stated that the mission in Iraq was to train Iraqi security forces so they can do the fighting;

Whereas the Pentagon reports that more than 240,000 Iraqi military and police personnel are now trained and equipped;

Whereas on May 1, 2003, President Bush stood under a banner proclaiming "Mission Accomplished" and declared that Iraq was an ally of al-Qaeda;

Whereas the 9/11 Commission Report found no collaborative operational relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda;

Whereas the commander of the Multinational Forces-Iraq, General George Casey, testified before the Senate Committee on Armed Services on September 29, 2005, that `[i]ncreased coalition presence feeds the notion of occupation ... contributes to the dependency of Iraqi security forces on the coalition ... [and] ... extends the amount of time that it will take for Iraqi security forces to become self-reliant';

Whereas, according to a January 2006 poll, 64 percent of Iraqis believe that crime and violent attacks will decrease when the United States redeploys from Iraq, 67 percent of Iraqis believe that their day-to-day security will increase if the U.S. redeploys from Iraq, and 73 percent of Iraqis believe that there will be greater cooperation among Iraq's political factions when the United States redeploys from Iraq: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That –

(1) United States forces in Iraq are to be redeployed from Iraq within 6 months or at the earliest practicable date.

(2) A quick-reaction U.S. force and an over-the-horizon presence of U.S. Marines shall be deployed in the region.

(3) Nothing in this resolution shall prohibit the use of U.S. military forces to –

  • (A) conduct targeted and specialized missions;
  • (B) train Iraqi security forces in the region; and
  • (C) protect U.S. personnel.

4. Rep. Barbara Lee Resolution of Inquiry on Iran: H. RES. 846
Co-sponsors: Conyers, Baldwin, McGovern, Payne
Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of State to provide to the House of Representatives certain documents in their possession relating to strategies and plans either designed to cause regime change in or for the use of military force against Iran.
Resolved, That the President is requested and the Secretary of State is directed to provide to the House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, all documents, including planning documents, electronic mail records, minutes, memoranda, and advisory legal opinions, in the possession of the President or the Secretary of State, respectively, relating to strategies, and plans either designed to cause regime change in or for the use of military force against Iran.




Solidarity Street Demonstrations To Demand US Keep hands Off Venezuela and Cuba

16 May 2006, by Stephen Lendman, OpEdNews.Com

Maybe it's just a coincidence that just days before an international expression of solidarity demanding the US keep its hands off Venezuela and Cuba, Rep. Dan Burton (a right wing Republican in good standing) introduced an anti-Venezuelan resolution in the US House of Representatives. His resolution on May 11 was just another step along the way in the Bush administration's fourth attempt to oust President Hugo Chavez as the democratically elected leader of the Venezuelan people. The resolution shows at least two things: that the US government's stated commitment to democracy is farcical and empty on its face and that any resemblance in it between the truth about the Chavez government's achievements in combatting drug trafficking and money laundering (and all else for that matter) and the malicious inaccuracies and misstatements of facts in the Burton resolution is in writing for all to see. ...   [read more]




  • Fri, November 10, 9am to Saturday Nov 11, 2006 3:00 pm. "Eyes Wide Open" is a moving exhibit of the boots of Iraq soldiers - Monument Square, Concord, beginning with set up at 9am Friday, November 10 and continuing for 30 hours.

Poll: of Non Fox News Viewers, 64% support Censure of George W Bush, 75% Want Cheney Impeachment Investigation Started

13 May 2006, by Rob Kall OpEdNews.Com

The OpEdNews/Zogby People's poll clearly shows that Fox News is the only thing keeping the Bush administration from being thrown out of office and into jail.


Send your personal message to both your senators at once by electronic mail, with the subject "Censure George Bush" At the same time you can send your personal comments only as a letter to the editor of your nearest local daily newspaper.   [read more]

Please click on image to send messages to your senators and local newspaper.....


MARCH FOR PEACE, JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY

End the war in Iraq
Bring all our troops home now!

Saturday, April 29, 2006, New York City

Our message to the White House and to Congress is clear: Either stand with us or stand aside! We are coming together to march, to vote, to speak out and to turn our country around!
  • No more never-ending oil wars!
  • Protect our civil liberties & immigrant rights. End illegal spying, government corruption and the subversion of our democracy.
  • Rebuild our communities, starting with the Gulf Coast. Stop corporate subsidies and tax cuts for the wealthy while ignoring our basic needs.
  • Act quickly to address the climate crisis and the accelerating destruction of our environment.

Update:

Tens of Thousands in NYC Protest War

By DESMOND BUTLER, Associated Press Writer 30 Apr 2006

NEW YORK - Tens of thousands of protesters marched Saturday through lower Manhattan to demand an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, just hours after this month's death toll reached 70.

...The demonstrators stretched for about 10 blocks as they headed down Broadway. Organizers said 300,000 people marched, though a police spokesman declined to give an estimate. There were no reports of arrests. ... [read more]


World Water Day 2006
March 22, 2006

The facts are mind boggling. More than 1 billion people world wide – 20% of the planet’s entire human population – lack access to clean, safe drinking water. According to the United Nations, this world water crisis leads to the death of more than 4,500 children every year and is a leading cause of poverty, disease, and social instability world wide. [ read more ]

Big Water's Boondoggle  By Kathryn Mulvey, AlterNet. Posted March 21, 2006
While water industry honchos crow over bottled water profits, activists are trying to prevent a public health disaster.

Law Students Protest Alberto Gonzalez at Georgetown University

Alberto Gonzales spoke before law students at Georgetown today, justifying illegal, unauthorized surveilance of US citizens, but during the course of his speech the students in class did something pretty ballsy and brave. They got up from their seats and turned their backs to him.

To make matters worse for Gonzales, additional students came into the room, wearing black cowls and carrying a simple banner, written on a sheet.

Fortunately for him, it was a brief speech... followed by a panel discussion that basically ripped his argument apart.

And, as one of the people on the panel said,
"When you're a law student, they tell you if say that if you can't argue the law, argue the facts. They also tell you if you can't argue the facts, argue the law. If you can't argue either, apparently, the solution is to go on a public relations offensive and make it a political issue... to say over and over again "it's lawful", and to think that the American people will somehow come to believe this if we say it often enough.

In light of this, I'm proud of the very civil civil disobedience that was shown here today." - David Cole, Georgetown University Law Professor. It was a good day for dissent.   [ read more ]


Learn about the African Great Lakes Initiative

The African Great Lakes Initiative (AGLI) of the Friends Peace Teams strengthens, supports, and promotes peace activities at the grassroots level in the Great Lakes region of Africa (Burundi, Congo, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda). To this end, AGLI responds to requests from local religious and non-governmental organizations that focus on conflict management, peace building, trauma healing, and reconciliation. AGLI sponsors Peace Teams composed of members from local partners and the international community.  [read more about the AGLI]
Geographical information: [ view region from space ]






Latest Articles

Resolution To Support Our Troops By Bringing Them Home From Iraq And Afghanistan And To Cut The Military Budget In Order To Have The Resources That We Need At Home
Boston, MA, 14 Feb 2007, City Council

By Councilors Chuck Turner, Felix D. Arroyo, Charles C. Yancey, Sam Yoon and Michael Ross.

Resolved, that the Boston City Council supports gatherings such as the one that will take place in Washington, D.C., on March 17, 2007 which show the support of the people of this country for policies such as those outlined above. [ View Resolution ]

Helen Caldicott: The New Nuclear Danger
2003, Goldman School of Public Policy, Berkeley, CA

One hour video

Dr.Helen Caldicott, M.D. is the Founder & President of the Nuclear Policy Research Institute. She is also the Founder of Physicians for ... all » Social Responsibility. In her unique style, she makes a compelling case against the use of Nuclear Power. She cuts through the rhetoric and tells it as it is. Filmed at UC Berkeley 2003. [  view video ]

Howard Zinn, "The Uses of History and the War on Terrorism."
Madison, Wisconsin, 24 November 2006

Every Little Thing We Do.

Howard Zinn is one of this country's most celebrated historians. His classic work "A People's History of the United States" changed the way we look at history in America. First published a quarter of a century ago, the book has sold over a million copies and is a phenomenon in the world of publishing - selling more copies each successive year. [includes rush transcript]

...
I became friends a few years ago with an Italian war surgeon named Gino Strada. He spent ten years, fifteen years doing surgery on war victims all over the world. And he wrote a book about it, Green Parrots: Diary of a War Surgeon. He said in all the patients that he operated on in Iraq and Afghanistan and everywhere, 85% of them were civilians, one-third of them, children. If you understand, and if people understand, and if you spread the word of this understanding, that whatever is told to you about war and how we must go to war, and whatever the threat is or whatever the goal is -- a democracy or liberty -- it will always be a war against children. They’re the ones who will die in large numbers.
....

[  read more ]

Why is the American press silent on the report of 655,000 Iraqi deaths?
By Joe Kay and Barry Grey, 13 October 2006

WSWS : News & Analysis : Middle East : Iraq

The US media is virtually silent on a new scientific study that estimates the Iraqi death toll from the US war at 655,000. The study, conducted by Johns Hopkins University’s Bloomberg School of Public Health and funded by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was posted Wednesday on the web site of the British medical journal, the Lancet. [  read more ]

Stand Up for Democracy With Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
by Thom Hartmann, 5 Jun 2006

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has written a brilliant new article [ Was the American Election Stolen? ] about the biggest political story in the history of the United States: An American politician illegitimately took the office of president by outright theft and fraud. Although such high crimes and misdemeanors have been rumored in previous elections, none in the history of the republic have been so thoroughly documented. George W. Bush is not the legitimate president of the United States.   [  read more 

Also,

Analysis of Connally spreadsheet and other documents

by Ron Baiman
Editor's note: The Free Press is releasing these articles by Ron Baiman that generally support the analysis by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in the current issue of Rolling Stone. [  read more  ]

Media Reviews Plame's Wardrobe -- But Not White House Coverup
by By Greg Mitchell, 17 Mar 2007, Editor&Publisher Journal

In their rush to cover the long-awaited testimony of Valerie Plame, few reporters apparently bothered to stick around the Capitol Hill hearing room yesterday to witness the just as shocking testimony of a much less heralded (and not so attractive) insider named James Knodell. [  read more ]

Bush Proposes Steep Cut to PBS Funding
by Ira Teinowitz, February 5, 2007, TVWeek.com

President Bush is reopening the fight over government support of public television, unveiling a 2007 government fiscal year budget that would cut federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting by nearly 25 percent.   [  read the entrie article ]

** Also **

"A democracy can die of too many lies"


by Bill Moyers, May 17, 2005, Salon.com

{Ed. note: While this is not new, it is as relevant today as it was almost two years ago when it was written.]
Television journalist Bill Moyers blasts flag-wearing phonies, reporters who parrot the government line, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting's "dangerous" campaign to silence dissenting voices.

"I wore my flag tonight. First time. Until now I haven't thought it necessary to display a little metallic icon of patriotism for everyone to see. It was enough to vote, pay my taxes, perform my civic duties, speak my mind, and do my best to raise our kids to be good Americans.

"Sometimes I would offer a small prayer of gratitude that I had been born in a country whose institutions sustained me, whose armed forces protected me, and whose ideals inspired me; I offered my heart's affections in return. It no more occurred to me to flaunt the flag on my chest than it did to pin my mother's picture on my lapel to prove her son's love. Mother knew where I stood; so does my country. I even tuck a valentine in my tax returns on April 15.

"So what's this doing here? Well, I put it on to take it back. The flag's been hijacked and turned into a logo -- the trademark of a monopoly on patriotism. On those Sunday morning talk shows, official chests appear adorned with the flag as if it is the good housekeeping seal of approval. During the State of the Union, did you notice Bush and Cheney wearing the flag? How come? No administration's patriotism is ever in doubt, only its policies. And the flag bestows no immunity from error. When I see flags sprouting on official lapels, I think of the time in China when I saw Mao's little red book on every official's desk, omnipresent and unread.

"But more galling than anything are all those moralistic ideologues in Washington sporting the flag in their lapels while writing books and running Web sites and publishing magazines attacking dissenters as un-American. They are people whose ardor for war grows disproportionately to their distance from the fighting. They're in the same league as those swarms of corporate lobbyists wearing flags and prowling Capitol Hill for tax breaks even as they call for more spending on war.

"So I put this on as a modest riposte to men with flags in their lapels who shoot missiles from the safety of Washington think tanks, or argue that sacrifice is good as long as they don't have to make it, or approve of bribing governments to join the coalition of the willing (after they first stash the cash.) I put it on to remind myself that not every patriot thinks we should do to the people of Baghdad what bin Laden did to us. The flag belongs to the country, not to the government. And it reminds me that it's not un-American to think that war -- except in self-defense -- is a failure of moral imagination, political nerve, and diplomacy. Come to think of it, standing up to your government can mean standing up for your country."   [  read the entrie article ]

Iraq: The Democrats Plan For the Way Forward?
by Rep. Jim McDermott, 15 Nov, Huffington Post

Four Steps to Sanity in the Middle East

...Once there we recorded 26 hours of interviews with Jacob Rosen, the Israel Ambassador to Jordan, Iraq Members of Parliament, Dulaymi tribal chiefs from Anbar province, the Jordanian Speaker of the House, two Jordanian Parliamentarians, two Lebanese including a Sunni Parliamentarian who flew to Amman to meet us, a Palestinian woman sent by Mustafa Barghuti, who is mediating the creation of a new unity government in Palestine, a group of Iraqi exiles living in Amman, George Hawatmeh, the former editor of the Jordanian Times. I had asked to meet with secular moderate legislators in order to see if there is a consensus on the way forward. I was there to listen.

...What I heard from the Iraqis, Palestinians, Jordanians and Israeli, these four points [see article, ed.] could be the skeleton of the new Democratic majority's plan for going forward in Iraq.   [  read article ]

Oil Spill Disaster, Lebanon; Forest Fires, Israel and Lebanon
by Friends of the Earth Europe, September 25, 2006

Catastrophe in the midst of a tragedy

The war in Lebanon between Israel and the Lebanese Muslim Shiite group Hizbullah began on 12th July 2006. By the time a ceasefire halted the fighting five weeks later on 14th August, more than 1,300 people had been killed and thousands more injured on both sides of the border. In addition to the human tragedy, the environment in the Middle East took numerous blows. Friends of the Earth Europe is concerned that a "second round" of fighting could start at any moment. We call for a just and peaceful solution to the issues of the conflict, to prevent more losses of innocent lives and the destruction of the environment in Lebanon and Israel. [  read more ]

Media Channel Features

(1) Ending the NeoCon Nightmare

By Daniel Levy, Haaretz

Disentangling Israeli interests from the rubble of neocon "creative destruction" in the Middle East has become an urgent challenge for Israeli policy-makers. An America that seeks to reshape the region through an unsophisticated mixture of bombs and ballots, devoid of local contextual understanding, alliance-building or redressing of grievances, ultimately undermines both itself and Israel. The sight this week of Secretary of State Rice homeward bound, unable to touch down in any Arab capital, should have a sobering effect in Washington and Jerusalem. ... [  read more ]

(2) Headlines from the Backpage

Important News You May Have Missed. Compiled by Media Channel.

Iraq: Tens of thousands rally to support Hezbollah, call US and Israel 'Terrorists'...Hezbollah offers cease-fire, Israel rejects...Jordan warns US it is fanning anti-American sentiment in Middle East...Journalists Held in Guantanamo publish account of torture: women, children, elderly held...Bush Admin tries to increase unchecked power by re-writing law...Coverage of the war in Lebanon called 'grossly inaccurate' ... [  read more ]
Standing for Something
by line, John Kerry Blog, 31 July 2006

The quality of health care should never depend on the color of any American's skin.

...What I put forward in 2004 works. It was a good plan then, and it's a good plan now. The proposal I'm going to fight for this year and next year-- and until it gets done -- lives up to that challenge in a sensible, practical, comprehensive way that will cover all Americans with better quality at lower costs by 2012. [  read more ]

Media ignore memo from U.S. Embassy on deteriorating situation in Iraq
MediaChannel.org

Summary: On June 18, The Washington Post published a cable sent from the U.S. Embassy in Iraq that detailed the deteriorating conditions observed in Baghdad in recent months. Despite the clear significance of the document, the media have almost entirely ignored its publication.   [ Read More ]

Enron Lies

By Robert Parry, Consortiumnews.com

May 26, 2006 .... By the 2000 presidential campaign, Lay was a Pioneer for Bush, raising $100,000. Enron also gave the Republicans $250,000 for the convention in Philadelphia and contributed $1.1 million in soft money to the Republican Party. Not only was Lay a top fund-raiser for the campaign, but he helped out during the recount battle in Florida in November 2000.

Lay and his wife donated $10,000 to Bush’s Florida recount fund that helped pay for Republican lawyers and other expenses. Lay even let Bush operatives use Enron’s corporate jet to fly in reinforcements. After Bush secured his victory, another $300,000 poured in from Enron circles – including $100,000 from Lay and $100,000 from Skilling – for the Bush-Cheney Inaugural Fund.

Yet, after the Enron scandal broke, Bush acted as if he barely knew Lay. On Jan. 11, 2002, Bush told reporters that Lay “was a supporter of Ann Richards in my run in 1994” for Texas governor, implying that he had gotten to know Lay as Gov. Richards’ holdover appointee to a Texas business council.


..... Again, Lay was influencing policy behind the scenes. An April 2001 memo from Lay to Cheney advised the administration to resist price caps.

“The administration should reject any attempt to re-regulate wholesale power markets by adopting price caps or returning to archaic methods of determining the cost-base of wholesale power,” Lay said. [San Francisco Chronicle, Jan. 30, 2002]

Cheney and Bush echoed Lay’s position in their political exchanges with Davis and other Democrats. On April 18, 2001, Cheney told the Los Angeles Times that the Bush administration opposed price caps because they would discourage investment. [L.A. Times, April 19, 2001]

In May 2001, Bush traveled to California on a trip choreographed like a President visiting a disaster area. Only this time, Bush wasn’t promising federal help to a state in need. He was carrying the same message that Lay had sent to Cheney. In effect, Bush was saying: Read my lips. No price caps.

“Price caps do nothing to reduce demand, and they do nothing to increase supply,” Bush said. [L.A. Times, May 30, 2001]    [ read more ]

See Also Enron: The Bush Connection
The Ombudsman Column
By Michael Getler, 26 May 2006, pbs.org

He's Back: Moyers, not Tomlinson

....
We have it in our power to bring the country into the story. We are public broadcasting, right? We're not congressional broadcasting — that's C-SPAN. We're not the White House network — that's Fox News. We're the only broadcasting operation in the country with the words "public" and "service" in our name. That's our constituency — not the politicians and Washington officials — but the public.

I've been around a long time now. What great company all of you have been. But I really think the best is yet to come. We've never been more needed. Democracy is troubled. Our two parties are wholly owned subsidiaries of Big Money and subservient to Big Media. The majority of the American people don't know where to turn, who to trust. Here we are — with a mandate to put the public first. [  read more ]

Will the major media finally cover the electronic election fraud issue?

15 May 2006 by Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman FreePress.org

That the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Washington Post finally ran coverage of problems with electronic voting machines this week is itself big news. It says the scandals surrounding computer fraud and financial illegalities at Diebold and other electronic voting machine companies have become simply too big and blatant for even the bought, docile mainstream media (MSM) to ignore.

The gaping holes in the security of electronic voting machines are pretty old news. Bev Harris's blackboxvoting.com has been issuing definitive research since Florida 2000. Freepress.org warned of the impending electronic theft of Ohio 2004 with Diebold machines eight months before it happened.

...

Despite overwhelming evidence that George W. Bush has occupied the White House due to the fraudulent manipulations of the GOP Secretaries of State in Florida and Ohio, none of this has seeped into "journals of record" like the Times and Post.    [ read more ]
More, much more, simply Google: election fraud Ohio 2004
Also check out 911Research.Com whoops, another web site gone away, check out this copy


This from 'Why is the Media Downplaying Our Voting Scandal?'

By Danny Schechter, MediaChannel.org

The public, on the other hand, not only believes that there are problems but many insist that the elections were stolen. Write Wasserman and Fitrakis: “A recent OpEdNews.com/Zogby People's poll of Pennsylvania residents, found that '39 percent said that the 2004 election was stolen. Fifty-four percent said it was legitimate. But let’s look at the demographics on this question. Of the people who watch FOX news as their primary source of TV news, one half of one percent believe it was stolen and 99 percent believe it was legitimate. Among people who watched ANY other news source but FOX, more felt the election was stolen than legitimate. The numbers varied dramatically.'”

“Here, from that poll, are the stations listed as first choice by respondents and the percentage of respondents who thought the election was stolen: CNN 70 percent; MSNBC 65 percent; CBS 64 percent; ABC 56 percent; Other 56 percent; NBC 49 percent; FOX 0.5 percent.

“With 99 percent of FOX viewers believing that the election was “legitimate,” only the constant propaganda of Rupert Murdoch’s Disinformation campaign stands in the way of a majority of Americans coming to grips with the reality of two consecutive stolen elections.”   [ Read More ]

Iraq and Washington’s ‘seeds of democracy’

Iraqi seed treasure destroyed
30 July 2005 by F. William Engdahl

Iraq is part of Mesopotamia, the cradle of civilization, where the fertile valley between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers created ideal conditions for crop cultivation. Iraqi farmers have existed since approximately 8,000 B.C. and had developed the rich seed variety for almost every variety of wheat used in the world today. They did this through a system of saving a share of seeds and replanting, developing new naturally resistant hybrid varieties through the new plantings.

For years, the Iraqis had held samples of such precious natural seed varieties in a national seed bank, located, ironically, in Abu Ghraib, the city made infamous as a US military torture prison site in 2004. Following the US occupation and various bombing campaigns, the historic and invaluable seed bank in Abu Ghraib vanished, a possible further casualty of the Iraq war.

Bremer’s Pentagon advisers had very different plans for Iraq’s food future.

Iraqi agriculture was to be ‘modernized,’ industrialized and reoriented away from traditional family multi-crop farming, into US-style agribusiness enterprises, producing for the ‘world market.’ Serving the food security needs of hungry Iraqis would be purely incidental to that plan.

The CPA’s Order 81, behind the cover of complicated legal jargon, in effect, turned the food future of Iraq over to global multinational private companies, hardly the liberation most Iraqis had hoped for.

Order 81 on Intellectual Property Rights, was not negotiated between a sovereign government and the WTO, or another government. It was imposed on Iraq without debate, from Washington. According to informed Washington reports, the specific details of Order 81 on plants were written for the US Government by Monsanto Corporation, the world’s leading purveyor of GMO seeds and crops.

....
As soon as Order 81 had been issued, USAID began delivering thousands of tons of US-origin ‘high-quality, certified wheat seed” for subsidized, initially near cost-free distribution through the Agriculture Ministry, to desperate Iraqi farmers. The USAID refused to allow independent scientists to determine whether the seed was GMO seed or not. Naturally, should it prove to have been GMO wheat seed, within one or two seasons, Iraqi farmers would find themselves suddenly dependent on paying royalty fees to foreign seed companies to survive. ....   [ read more ]

Accuracy: Lap Dogs of the Press

By Helen Thomas, The Nation, March 10, 2006

..... I honestly believe that if reporters had put the spotlight on the flaws in the Bush Administration's war policies, they could have saved the country the heartache and the losses of American and Iraqi lives. .... [ read more ]



How Stephen Colbert Got Picked, Truthy, And Panned

17 May 2006, Opinion: Bill Grigsby, Scoop Independent News

This White House has challenged the frontiers of propaganda and political discourse in ways that make previous administrations look like rank amateurs. Mainstream news media outlets may occasionally report, but the vast majority shy away from labeling government accounts as propaganda. ...[ read more ]



Integrity: ....

   Searching....
UN creates new rights council
By Evelyn Leopold, March 15, 2006

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The United Nations General Assembly created a new U.N. human rights body by an overwhelming majority on the 15th, ignoring objections from the United States. [ read more ]

Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations
Greenpeace International, 23 September 2005

An unclassified draft of a US nuclear doctrine review that spells out conditions under which US commanders might seek approval to use nuclear weapons. [ read more ]

Estabrook Woods

All about the Estabrook Woods, or Thoreau's Easterbrooks Country

7 November 2005
Middlesex School has started construction 1200 feet inside the Estabrook Woods.

More at >>
  • All about the Estabrook Woods, or Thoreau's Easterbrooks Country
  • A Gentlemen's Agreement Gone Bad
  • School Plan for Woods Advances    By Sally Heaney, Globe Correspondent March 5th, 2006
  • Kucinich: House International Relations Committee Once Again Shuns War Oversight Duties House International Relations Committee Narrowly Rejects Kucinich Resolution of Inquiry On White House Iraq Group (WHIG) [link]

    WASHINGTON - November 9 - Today, by a narrow 25-23 vote, the House International Relations Committee rejected a Resolution of Inquiry, offered by Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich (D-OH) and co-sponsored by 106 Members of Congress, demanding all documents produced by the White House Iraq Group (WHIG).

    The Kucinich Resolution (H. Res. 505) demanded that the White House turn over to Congress all white papers, minutes, notes, emails or other communications kept by the WHIG. Kucinich's resolution was supported by all Democrats at the committee hearing and Congressman Paul (R-TX) and Congressman Leach (R-IA).

    After the vote, Kucinich issued the following statement:

    "Congress has a Constitutional duty to provide oversight of the Executive Branch. Today the House International Relations Committee, once again, shunned this vital duty.

    "We now know that the Administration hyped intelligence and misled the American public and Congress in their effort to 'sell' the war. This group, comprised of the President and Vice President's top aides, was critical in this effort.

    "Congress and the American people have a right to these documents, and a right to know the truth.

    "This Congress can no longer pass the buck on accountability. With over 2,000 US troops killed in Iraq and tens of thousands more injured, it is long past time that this Congress wakes up and ask the serious questions that the American public is demanding answers to.

    "Time after time this Congress has failed its Constitutional duty, and failed the American public. This Congress has become nothing more than a rubber stamp for this Administration and their policies. We owe the American public better. That is what today's resolution was about."


    White House Iraq Group
    Also see Antiwar Backbone Stiffening in Congress?

    Fitzgerald Eyes Plame-Niger Conspiracy Prosecutor Probing Niger Forgeries, Possible Conspiracy in CIA Leak

    By Jason Leopold, t r u t h o u t | Investigative Report, 23 January 2006
    [ read more ]

    Kucinich Demands IG Investigation Into FBI's Handling Of Investigation Into Forged Niger Documents

    04 November, 2005

    FBI Drops Investigation Just As Italians Make A Potential Break In The Case; Kucinich Sends Department Of Justice A Letter Demanding Investigation.   [read more]

    1 in 4 Iraq Vets Ailing On Return

    More than one in four U.S. troops have come home from the Iraq war with health problems that require medical or mental health treatment, according to the Pentagon's first detailed screening of service members leaving a war zone....

    19 October 2005

    These survey results, which have not been publicly released, were provided to USA TODAY by the Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine. They offer a window on the war and how the ongoing insurgency has added to the strain on troops.

    More at >> USA Today

    GAO Report Finds Flaws in Electronic Voting, New Data Shows Widespread Vote Manipulations in 2004

    Friday 21 October 2005

    Rep. Waxman led twelve members of Congress today in releasing a new Government Accountability Office report that found security and reliability flaws in the electronic voting process.

    In a joint press release, Rep. Waxman said, "The GAO report indicates that we need to get serious and act quickly to improve the security of electronic voting machines. The report makes clear that there is a lack of transparency and accountability in electronic voting systems - from the day that contracts are signed with manufacturers to the counting of electronic votes on Election Day. State and local officials are spending a great deal of money on machines without concrete proof that they are secure and reliable."   [read more]

    Powerful GAO Report Confirms Key 2004 Stolen Election Findings

    December 4, 2005 by Lyn Davis Lear, Huffington Post

    As a legal noose appears to be tightening around the Bush/Cheney/Rove inner circle, a shocking Government Accountability Office report shows the floor under the legitimacy of their alleged election to the White House is crumbling.

    In essence, the GAO study makes it clear that no bank, grocery store or mom & pop chop shop would dare operate its business on a computer system as flimsy, fragile and easily manipulated as the one on which the 2004 election turned. [ read more]

    Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

    We Must Take America Back by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr

    Wed, 17 September 2005
    The White House has used all kinds of ingenious machinations to try to conceal its radical agenda from the American people including Orwellian rhetoric. When they want to destroy the forests, they call it the Healthy Forest Act. When they wanted to destroy the air, they called it the Clear Skies Bill

    But most insidiously, they have put polluters in charge of virtually all the agencies that are supposed to protect Americans from pollution.

    More at >> TruthOut.Org

    Twenty Things We Now Know Four Years After 9/11

    In a few days, it will be four years since the awful events symbolized by the date "9/11." Time for our annual list of what we've learned from that tragedy and what followed from it.

    Much new information has been revealed this year, with corroborating documents verifying aspects of the story we only surmised previously. So without further ado, below are the twenty things we now know four years after 9/11, based mainly on documented evidence found in the Bush-friendly mainstream media.

    A general assessment before we begin the numbered list: There now is a widely-accepted foreign and domestic judgment that the Bush Administration is composed of bumbling, dangerous, close-minded ideologues. You can see it in the polls (as I write this, the president has only a 40% approval rating, amazingly low) and, particularly, in how many conservative/traditional Republicans and former military officers are expressing remorse at having supported this guy in the 2004 election. The president these days still has his true-believer base of about 30%, but he's extremely vulnerable politically, which is why Rove and his minions are so desperate right now and are ratcheting up the rhetoric and smear-tactics against their political enemies. And the desperation helps us understand why the president keeps returning to 9/11, the one talisman that he thinks still may work for him, that singular moment in his history when many Americans thought he looked good.

    > More at >> CrisisPapers.Org

    Coalition Builds Momentum on Universal Health Care

    With over 45 million people without any health care coverage, according to Census Bureau surveys, Marilyn Clement, national coordinator of Healthcare Now!, sees no other alternative but to campaign tirelessly for universal health care. Clement recently talked with Political Affairs by telephone to discuss the need for a universal single-payer health care plan and the work of the coalition she coordinates to achieve one.

    10 October 2005
    Clement’s coalition supports a single-payer plan that would expand Medicare to cover everyone. Medicare under this plan would be the single-payer, rather than the currently failed mess of cobbled together insurance, consumer, and government payers. This plan has been introduced to Congress by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) as the US National Health Insurance Act (H.R. 676).

    According to the Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP, an organizational partner of the Healthcare Now! coalition), on average, private insurers take 13 percent of all premium dollars for profit or overhead. Large HMOs, profits and overhead amount to about 30 percent of premiums. In fact, HMOs have become notorious for sacrificing coverage to increase profits. By contrast, says PNHP, "overhead consumes less than 2 percent of funds in the fee-for-service Medicare program, and less than 1 percent in Canada’s program."
    More at >> Political Affairs on the Net

    Libby Indictment May Open Door to Broader Iraq War Deceptions
    by Stephen Zunes, ZNet, November 22, 2005

    ...Such a case might be worth consideration if the Bush administration and congressional leaders had demonstrated that they had the integrity, knowledge, foresight, and competence to successfully lead a counterinsurgency war in a complex, fractured society on the far side of the planet. To support the continued prosecution of the Iraq War, however, would require trusting the same politicians who hoodwinked the country into that war in the first place. A growing number of Americans, therefore, have come to recognize that any administration dishonest enough to make the ludicrous pre-war claims of an Iraqi military threat and any Congress that -- through whatever combination of dishonesty or stupidity -- chose to reinforce these false assertions simply cannot be trusted to successfully control the insurgency, extricate the United States from further military involvement, and successfully facilitate Iraq's development as a peaceful, secure, democratic country.  [read more]

    The Honorable John P. Murtha, War in Iraq (Full Text of Speech)
    November 18, 2005

    (Washington D.C.)- The war in Iraq is not going as advertised. It is a flawed policy wrapped in illusion. The American public is way ahead of us. The United States and coalition troops have done all they can in Iraq, but it is time for a change in direction. Our military is suffering. The future of our country is at risk. We can not continue on the present course. It is evident that continued military action in Iraq is not in the best interest of the United States of America, the Iraqi people or the Persian Gulf Region.

    General Casey said in a September 2005 Hearing, "the perception of occupation in Iraq is a major driving force behind the insurgency." General Abizaid said on the same date, "Reducing the size and visibility of the coalition forces in Iraq is a part of our counterinsurgency strategy."

    For 2 ½ years I have been concerned about the U.S. policy and the plan in Iraq. I have addressed my concerns with the Administration and the Pentagon and have spoken out in public about my concerns. The main reason for going to war has been discredited. A few days before the start of the war I was in Kuwait—the military drew a red line around Baghdad and said when U.S. forces cross that line they will be attacked by the Iraqis with Weapons of Mass Destruction—but the US forces said they were prepared. They had well trained forces with the appropriate protective gear.

    We spend more money on Intelligence than all the countries in the world together, and more on Intelligence than most countries GDP. But the intelligence concerning Iraq was wrong. It is not a world intelligence failure. It is a U.S. intelligence failure and the way that intelligence was misused.

    I have been visiting our wounded troops at Bethesda and Walter Reed hospitals almost every week since the beginning of the War. And what demoralizes them is going to war with not enough troops and equipment to make the transition to peace; the devastation caused by IEDs; being deployed to Iraq when their homes have been ravaged by hurricanes; being on their second or third deployment and leaving their families behind without a network of support.

    The threat posed by terrorism is real, but we have other threats that cannot be ignored. We must be prepared to face all threats. The future of our military is at risk. Our military and their families are stretched thin. Many say that the Army is broken. Some of our troops are on their third deployment. Recruitment is down, even as our military has lowered its standards. Defense budgets are being cut. Personnel costs are skyrocketing, particularly in health care. Choices will have to be made. We can not allow promises we have made to our military families in terms of service benefits, in terms of their health care, to be negotiated away. Procurement programs that ensure our military dominance cannot be negotiated away. We must be prepared. The war in Iraq has caused huge shortfalls at our bases in the U.S.

    Much of our ground equipment is worn out and in need of either serious overhaul or replacement. George Washington said, "To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means of preserving peace." We must rebuild our Army. Our deficit is growing out of control. The Director of the Congressional Budget Office recently admitted to being "terrified" about the budget deficit in the coming decades. This is the first prolonged war we have fought with three years of tax cuts, without full mobilization of American industry and without a draft. The burden of this war has not been shared equally; the military and their families are shouldering this burden.

    Our military has been fighting a war in Iraq for over two and a half years. Our military has accomplished its mission and done its duty. Our military captured Saddam Hussein, and captured or killed his closest associates. But the war continues to intensify. Deaths and injuries are growing, with over 2,079 confirmed American deaths. Over 15,500 have been seriously injured and it is estimated that over 50,000 will suffer from battle fatigue. There have been reports of at least 30,000 Iraqi civilian deaths.

    I just recently visited Anbar Province Iraq in order to assess the conditions on the ground. Last May 2005, as part of the Emergency Supplemental Spending Bill, the House included the Moran Amendment, which was accepted in Conference, and which required the Secretary of Defense to submit quarterly reports to Congress in order to more accurately measure stability and security in Iraq. We have now received two reports. I am disturbed by the findings in key indicator areas. Oil production and energy production are below pre-war levels. Our reconstruction efforts have been crippled by the security situation. Only $9 billion of the $18 billion appropriated for reconstruction has been spent. Unemployment remains at about 60 percent. Clean water is scarce. Only $500 million of the $2.2 billion appropriated for water projects has been spent. And most importantly, insurgent incidents have increased from about 150 per week to over 700 in the last year. Instead of attacks going down over time and with the addition of more troops, attacks have grown dramatically. Since the revelations at Abu Ghraib, American casualties have doubled. An annual State Department report in 2004 indicated a sharp increase in global terrorism.

    I said over a year ago, and now the military and the Administration agrees, Iraq can not be won "militarily." I said two years ago, the key to progress in Iraq is to Iraqitize, Internationalize and Energize. I believe the same today. But I have concluded that the presence of U.S. troops in Iraq is impeding this progress.

    Our troops have become the primary target of the insurgency. They are united against U.S. forces and we have become a catalyst for violence. U.S. troops are the common enemy of the Sunnis, Saddamists and foreign jihadists. I believe with a U.S. troop redeployment, the Iraqi security forces will be incentivized to take control. A poll recently conducted shows that over 80% of Iraqis are strongly opposed to the presence of coalition troops, and about 45% of the Iraqi population believe attacks against American troops are justified. I believe we need to turn Iraq over to the Iraqis.

    I believe before the Iraqi elections, scheduled for mid December, the Iraqi people and the emerging government must be put on notice that the United States will immediately redeploy. All of Iraq must know that Iraq is free. Free from United States occupation. I believe this will send a signal to the Sunnis to join the political process for the good of a "free" Iraq.

    My plan calls:

    To immediately redeploy U.S. troops consistent with the safety of U.S. forces.
    To create a quick reaction force in the region.
    To create an over- the- horizon presence of Marines.
    To diplomatically pursue security and stability in Iraq

    This war needs to be personalized. As I said before I have visited with the severely wounded of this war. They are suffering.

    Because we in Congress are charged with sending our sons and daughters into battle, it is our responsibility, our OBLIGATION to speak out for them. That's why I am speaking out.

    Our military has done everything that has been asked of them, the U.S. can not accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. IT IS TIME TO BRING THEM HOME.



    Points to Ponder

    Burning the Law in a Riot of Treason

    27 Aug 2007 By William Rivers Pitt, Truthout

    Patriot's Needed
    ...
    Their treason is not in the actual crimes they have committed, but in the way they have chosen to avoid accountability for them. Their treason is not their refusal to obey the Freedom of Information Act, but in their insistence that they are above the application of that law. Their treason is not in their refusal to obey subpoenas from Congress, but in their claim that they are above the laws behind those subpoenas. Their treason is not that they fired United States attorneys and then refused to come clean about it, but that they decimated the impartiality of the Department of Justice and turned the rule of law into another partisan weapon. Their treason is not the NSA surveillance of Americans, but their steadfast refusal to submit to the governing laws and the requirement of oversight. ....   [ read more ]

    Dashed Hopes - Part B

    March 15, 2007 - Creeping fascism, stagnant public concern

    If an illegal war didn't merit the public's unforgiving disgust then, what possibly could now? The canning of government lawyers? Come on. Let's get real, even though these days that is a sad exercise.....   [ read more ]

    "Impeachment May Well Be the Only Remedy"

    Remarks by Rep. Dennis Kucinich on the floor of the U.S. House, March 15, 2007:

    ...
    The US is a signatory to the UN Charter, a constituent treaty among the nations of the world. Article II, Section 4 of the UN Charter states, "all members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. . ." Even the threat of a war of aggression is illegal.

    Article VI of the US Constitution makes such treaties the Supreme Law of the Land. This Administration, has openly threatened aggression against Iran in violation of the US Constitution. and the UN Charter.. ....   [ read more ]

    Impeachment Is Not Off the Table

    A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION by Peter Phillips, 22 Feb 2007

    ...To allow this administration to ride out the next two years without impeachment is to sanction a lying treasonous presidency and set precedence for future presidents to ignore Congress and the will of the people. A democracy cannot tolerate an imperial power centered in the White House. If we choose to defend our Constitution we must pressure Congress to go beyond political partisanship and serve the best interests of America.

    Peter Phillips    [ read more ]
    Preserving Democracy: What Went Wrong in Ohio
    Representative John Conyers, January 5th, 2005

    This report, therefore, makes three recommendations: (1) consistent with the requirements of the United States Constitution concerning the counting of electoral votes by Congress and Federal law implementing these requirements, there are ample grounds for challenging the electors from the State of Ohio; (2) Congress should engage in further hearings into the widespread irregularities reported in Ohio; we believe the problems are serious enough to warrant the appointment of a joint select Committee of the House and Senate to investigate and report back to the Members; and (3) Congress needs to enact election reform to restore our people's trust in our democracy. These changes should include putting in place more specific federal protections for federal elections, particularly in the areas of audit capability for electronic voting machines and casting and counting of provisional ballots, as well as other needed changes to federal and state election laws. [ read more ]

    Mark Crispin Miller Connects the Dots on Election Problems
    by Mark Crispin Miller, February 9, 2006

    That refusal to confront the evidence, and to concede that Bush & Co. were not elected, is certainly not based on reason. It’s based, rather, on deep denial and fearful ideology. It’s based on the absurd conviction that it can’t happen here. But ... our whole system of government is based on the assumption that it can happen anywhere, at any time—that it can happen here, and surely will unless we keep this system going with all its checks and balances. The Framers studied history, and saw “it” happening repeatedly, wherever power was concentrated in one person or one body or one mob. That’s why they designed the system as they did.   [ Part 1 ],    [ Part 2 ]

    Representative Dennis Kucinich's Statement on Depleted Uranium

    The United States must order an end to illegal use of depleted uranium munitions and lead an international effort to recover depleted uranium. We must promote environmental remediation. Also, we must develop a program to provide care and restitution for people suffering as a result of the United States' use of depleted uranium munitions, nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons production, nuclear testing, and uranium mining. ....   [ read more ]

    National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive

    White House, Office of the Press Secretary, 9 May 2007:

    (c) "Continuity of Government," or "COG," means a coordinated effort within the Federal Government's executive branch to ensure that National Essential Functions continue to be performed during a Catastrophic Emergency;

    (d) "Continuity of Operations," or "COOP," means an effort within individual executive departments and agencies to ensure that Primary Mission-Essential Functions continue to be performed during a wide range of emergencies, including localized acts of nature, accidents, and technological or attack-related emergencies; [note: emphasis added, ed.] . ....   [ read more ]
    Addressing Violence in America

    Already this Congress, Kucinich and Conyers have introduced HR 808 and HR 676 — two bills that directly relate to the events of Blacksburg.

    HR 808, legislation to establish a Department of Peace and Nonviolence, addresses the issue of domestic violence, gang violence, and violence in the schools, which is reflected in the current homicide rates. HR 808 has 62 cosponsors.
    “The bill provides hope for a transformation through education of our children in principles of nonviolence and support for existing community groups and professionals whose dedication would be empowered by a national commitment to peace and nonviolence,” Kucinich said.

    A recent study indicates that many perpetrators of murder had histories of mental illness. The lack of parity for mental healthcare remains one of the most serious deficiencies in healthcare in the United States – the system has long been lacking in substantive support of mental health. HR 676, Medicare for All, would establish a universal not-for-profit healthcare system, which would provide full and comprehensive mental healthcare. More than 14,000 physicians support HR 676 and it is cosponsored by 63 Members of Congress.

    Kucinich is currently drafting legislation that would ban the purchase, sale, transfer, or possession of handguns by civilians. A gun buy-back provision will be included in the bill.

    “America is being engulfed in violence every day. Let’s show them we have the wisdom and the courage to come from our hearts to meet this challenge,” Kucinich said.

    [  read more ]

    These two bills: HR 808 and HR 676 deserve serious consideration and enactment if we truly wish to attain peace and justice in our world - [ed.]

    Kucinich unveils comprehensive exit plan to bring troops home, stabilize Iraq

    The war in Iraq needs to wind down, and Congressman Dennis Kucinich has a 12 point plan to charter a new course for the United States and the world.
    "A war without reason, without conscious, without international law"
    See the YouTube video, Play Video

    In late September, it was reported that the National Intelligence Estimate for April said the war in Iraq is creating more terrorists: "A large body of all-source reporting indicates that activists identifying themselves as jihadists ... are increasing in both number and in geographic distribution. If this trend continues, threats to U.S. interests at home and abroad will become more diverse, leading to increasing attacks worldwide."

    The administration has released three pages of the 30-page report. We may see the rest of it, but not until after the November election. [  read more ]

    Landslide Denied: Exit Polls vs. Vote Count 2006

    Under-sampling of Democrats in the House Exit Poll and the Corruption of the Official Vote Count, by Jonathan Simon, JD, and Bruce O’Dell1, Election Defense Alliance:

    Unfortunately the evidence forces us to a very different and disturbing conclusion: there was gross vote count manipulation and it had a great impact on the results of E2006, significantly decreasing the magnitude of what would have been, accurately tabulated, a landslide of epic proportions. Because virtually all of this manipulation appears to have been computer-based, and therefore invisible to the legions of at-the-poll observers, the public was informed of “isolated incidents and glitches” but remains unaware of the far greater story: The electoral machinery and vote counting systems of the United States did not honestly and accurately translate the public will and certainly can not be counted on to do so in the future.   [ read more ]

    Associate Publisher: Public interest in news topics beyond control of mainstream media

    By Kennith F. Bunting, 09 Jun, 2006:    The blogosphere has been abuzz. But in the days since Rolling Stone magazine published a long piece that accused Republicans of widespread and intentional cheating that affected the outcome of the last presidential election, the silence in America's establishment media has been deafening.

    In terms of bad news judgment, this could turn out to be the 2006 equivalent of the infamous "Downing Street memo," the London Times story that was initially greeted by the U.S. media with a collective yawn.

    Robert Kennedy Jr.'s Rolling Stone mega-essay is titled "Was the 2004 Election Stolen?" It focuses on widespread voting irregularities, questionable tallies and disenfranchising practices, particularly in Ohio, which President Bush won by more than 100,000 votes.

    Singling out Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell for much of the blame, Kennedy writes persuasively that enough was awry in that state alone to raise serious questions as to whether Bush really defeated John Kerry in 2004. Blackwell, now a Republican candidate for governor, headed Bush's state re-election campaign at the same time he was constitutionally in charge of the state's voting machinery.text. ....   [ read more ]

    What really happened in Florida on 9/11

    27 April 2004 - Transcript of Bush/Cheney Testimony Before the 9/11 Commission -- A Satire By Bernard Weiner, Co-Editor, The Crisis Papers

    Chairman Kean: The Commission will come to order. Welcome, Mr. President and Mr. Vice President. Although, per our agreement, you are not being placed under oath, we expect that your testimony will consist only of the truth. The Commission and the American people deserve no less, and we trust you are in full agreement with this expectation.

    Cheney: Yes, of course.

    Bush: Sure, OK.

    ....   [ read more ]

    Let them call me as well- I will record and post the call!

    April 5, 2006 by Stephen Crockett, Democratic Talk Radio

    Subject(s): Corruption, Enemies of Democracy, First Amendment Speech, Republicans, Voting Integrity
    Local Area(s): Florida, Ohio
       [ read more ]

    Where's the accountability? What Will It Take?

    16 May 2006 By Marjorie Cohn, TruthOut.Org -- Since George W. Bush took the reins of government more than five years ago and began to systematically unravel the separation of powers and the rule of law, Congress has opened no investigations with subpoena power to hold the president accountable.

    The Justice Department's "inquiry" into Bush's NSA spying program ended abruptly last week when the National Security Agency refused to grant DOJ lawyers necessary security clearances.

    Bush justifies his warrantless surveillance programs as essential to keep America safe. Yet, as Frank Rich pointed out in Sunday's New York Times, these programs "may have more to do with monitoring 'traitors' like reporters and leakers than with tracking terrorists."

    In an attempt to neuter the press, Team Bush has been tracking the phone numbers reporters at ABC News, the New York Times and the Washington Post call.

    "What we have here is a clandestine surveillance program of enormous size, which is being operated by members of the administration who are subject to no limits or scrutiny beyond what they deem to impose on one another," the Times wrote in an editorial last week.""   ....   [ read more ]

    Democrats pledge fight over Net neutrality

    26 Apr 2006 - WASHINGTON--Partisan wrangling over Net neutrality heated up on Tuesday, with Democrats pledging a fight over a broadband bill they say will mean extra fees and content restrictions on the Internet.   ....   [ read more ]

    27 Apr 2006 - Tech Giants' Internet Battles Web titans like Google and Yahoo! are battling some of the smartest lobbyists in the business. And they've just lost a big one on Capitol Hill  ...   [ read more ]

    Gore urges moral crusade against global warming

    By Ian Hoffman, STAFF WRITER, Inside Bay Area
    OAKLAND, CA  March 7, 2006:   This is really not a political issue, it is disguised as a political issue," Gore said. "It is a moral issue, it is an ethical issue — If we allow this to happen, we will destroy the habitability of the planet. We can't do that, and I am confident we won't do that." ....   [ read more ]
    Restoring the Public Trust
    by Bill Moyers at TomPaine.com - Feb 24, 2006

    Think about this: Californians could buy back their elected representatives at a cost of about $5 or $6 per California resident. Nationally we could buy back our Congress and the White House with full public financing for about $10 per taxpayer per year. You can check this out on the website Public Campaign. [ www.publicampaign.org ]

    Public funding won’t solve all the problems. There’s no way to legislate truly immoral people from abusing our trust. But it would go a long way to breaking the link between big donors and public officials and to restoring democracy to the people. Until we offer qualified candidates a different source of funding for their campaigns – “clean,” disinterested, accountable public money – the selling of America will go on. From scandal to scandal.

    The people out across the country on the front lines of this fight have brought the message down to earth, in plain language and clear metaphors. If a player sliding into home plate reached into his pocket and handed the umpire $1000 before he made the call, what would we call that? A bribe. And if a lawyer handed a judge $1000 before he issued a ruling, what do we call that? A bribe. But when a lobbyist or CEO sidles up to a member of Congress at a fund raiser in a skybox and hands him a check for $1000, what do we call that? A campaign contribution.

    Representative Barney Frank likes to say of Congress: “We are the only people in the world required by law to take large amounts of money from strangers and then act as if it has no effect on our behavior.”  [ read more at TomPaine.com ]

    See also Public Campaign - Help support clean elections
                 Election Fraud links at The Crisis Papers
                 and Landslide Denied: Exit Polls vs. Vote Count 2006  

    What I Heard about Iraq

    Eliot Weinberger:

    In 1992, a year after the first Gulf War, I heard Dick Cheney, then secretary of defense, say that the US had been wise not to invade Baghdad and get ‘bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq’. I heard him say: ‘The question in my mind is how many additional American casualties is Saddam worth? And the answer is: not that damned many.’

    In February 2001, I heard Colin Powell say that Saddam Hussein ‘has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbours.’

    That same month, I heard that a CIA report stated: ‘We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its weapons of mass destruction programmes.’

    In July 2001, I heard Condoleezza Rice say: ‘We are able to keep his arms from him. His military forces have not been rebuilt.’

    On 11 September 2001, six hours after the attacks, I heard that Donald Rumsfeld said that it might be an opportunity to ‘hit’ Iraq. I heard that he said: ‘Go massive. Sweep it all up. Things related and not.’

    I heard that Condoleezza Rice asked: ‘How do you capitalise on these opportunities?’

    I heard that on 17 September the president signed a document marked top secret that directed the Pentagon to begin planning for the invasion and that, some months later, he secretly and illegally diverted $700 million approved by Congress for operations in Afghanistan into preparing for the new battle front.

    In February 2002, I heard that an unnamed ‘senior military commander’ said: ‘We are moving military and intelligence personnel and resources out of Afghanistan to get ready for a future war in Iraq.’

    yada yada yada ....   [ read more ]

    James Carroll Concludes the Pentagon Is Our Out-of-Control 'House of War'

    Buzzflash.com, 07/19/2006:

    BuzzFlash: So if we look at the Pentagon as an industry of national security -- you don’t advance and you don’t utilize those systems unless you have war.

    James Carroll: Yes, it’s true. And let’s be clear on why we go to war. We don’t go to war because of authentic national security issues. We go to war to preserve this dynamic. After the Cold War, the war that saved the system was the Gulf War. The reason we went to war against Saddam Hussein in 1991 very clearly had much more to do with the preservation of the Cold War system in America than it had to do with the threat that was posed by Saddam Hussein..... ....   [ read more ]

    War and Other Horrors

    July 14, 2006 - BuzzFlash Mailbag
    I hate to do it, but I just have to watch the news ... and folks, it ain't good! It seems to me like the entire middle east is bombing the hell out of the rest! Could someone tell me why it was so easy to impeach Bill Clinton ... over a blue dress ... and George Bush cannot be impeached over murder ... lies ... (about weapons ... not a dress) ... if nothing else ... the little dead babies in Iraq ... one of the saddest things I have ever seen? You know ... they are pretty little kids.... and they are dying all the time ... and what we hear is not good ... can you imagine what we do not hear?

    Shirley ... St. Louis. [ source ]

    What I Didn't Find in Africa

    Published on Sunday, July 6, 2003 by the New York Times by Joseph C. Wilson 4th:

    Did the Bush administration manipulate intelligence about Saddam Hussein's weapons programs to justify an invasion of Iraq?.
    ....
    More than 200 American soldiers have lost their lives in Iraq already. We have a duty to ensure that their sacrifice came for the right reasons.   [ read more ]

    Kucinich: Congress Must Protect The Media's First Amendment Rights

    WASHINGTON - June 29 - Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich (D-OH) gave the following speech today on the House floor: "It is about time the media did its job of protecting the public interest. If the media and this Congress had shown some independence from the party line of this Administration, the claims of WMDs would have been dismissed, and fact there was no connection between Iraq and 9/11 would have been well established and we would not have gone to war against Iraq. ....   [ read more ]

    Bush Is Not Incompetent (the Conservative Agenda Flourishes)

    By George Lakoff, Marc Ettlinger and Sam Ferguson, (c)The Rockridge Institute, 2006

    ...It's not Bush the man who has been so harmful, it's the conservative agenda.

    The idea that Bush is incompetent is a curious one. Consider the following (incomplete) list of major initiatives the Bush administration, with a loyal conservative Congress, has accomplished:

  • Centralizing power within the executive branch to an unprecedented degree
  • Starting two major wars, one started with questionable intelligence and in a manner with which the military disagreed
  • Placing on the Supreme Court two far-right justices, and stacking the lower federal courts with many more
  • Cutting taxes during wartime, an unprecedented event
  • Passing a number of controversial bills such as the PATRIOT Act, the No Child Left Behind Act, the Medicare Drug bill, the Bankruptcy bill and a number of massive tax cuts
  • Rolling back and refusing to enforce a host of basic regulatory protections
  • Appointing industry officials to oversee regulatory agencies
  • Establishing a greater role for religion through faith-based initiatives
  • Passing Orwellian-titled legislation assaulting the environment -- "The Healthy Forests Act" and the "Clear Skies Initiative" -- to deforest public lands, and put more pollution in our skies
  • Winning re-election and solidifying his party's grip on Congress
  • These aren't signs of incompetence. As should be painfully clear, the Bush administration has been overwhelmingly competent in advancing its conservative vision. It has been all too effective in achieving its goals by determinedly pursuing a conservative philosophy. [ read more ]

    Access of Evil

    Amy Goodman, Nation Magazine [from the July 3, 2006 issue]:

    If President Bush had stood on the steps of the White House with a megaphone when he set out to sell the Iraq War, he might have convinced a few people about the imminent threat posed by Saddam Hussein. But he had something far more powerful that convinced far more people: He had a compliant press corps ready to amplify his lies. This was the same press corps that investigated and reported for years on President Clinton's lying about an extramarital affair. The difference here was that President Bush's lies take lives. ....   [ read more ]

    Fatal Inaction

    By April Witt June 18, 2006: The world's most powerful military failed to provide the armor that would have saved scores of American lives. One father would like to know why. ....   [ read more ]

    Unquestioned Answers

    By Steve Bhaerman,  Nonconspiracy theorist David Ray Griffin takes aim at the official 9-11 story.

    Even more unusual, Griffin says, "the crime was solved immediately, and the official story was in place before the day of the attack was over. Within 48 hours, our president stood at the National Cathedral surrounded by Billy Graham, a cardinal, a rabbi and an imam, and used this religious setting to declare a holy war on terror."

    If we were to contrast the smoothness of the post-9-11 operation with the aftermath of Katrina, we are left with the question: How can a president so inept in one setting have been so "ept" in another? ....   [ read more ]

    Experts: Bush Presidency Is A Failure

    1 May 2006, Siena College, Loudonville, NY--At a time when President Bush’s public opinion polls are at an all time low, eight in ten history and political science professors rank President George W. Bush “below average” or “failure,” according to a new expert opinion poll by the Siena College Research Institute (SRI) released today. Furthermore, more than two-thirds of those surveyed think the President has no realistic chance of improving his rating.   ....   [ read more ]

    Greenpeace calls the Summit for Life on Earth a Failure

    Curitiba, Brazil, March 31st 2006: As the two-week long world summit on biodiversity drew to a close, Greenpeace described the outcome as major failure - a missed opportunity to stop the global loss of life in the world's forests and oceans. ....   [ read more ]
    It's Time For Hope
    by Senator Edward Kennedy, March 24, 2006

    You would think that promising new research that could bring lifesaving cures to millions of Americans - and that reflects our best values and highest ethical standards - would be embraced by all leaders, regardless of political party. But sadly, that's not the case when it comes to unlocking the healing potential of stem cells.

    Last year, Democrats and Republicans joined together in the House of Representatives to pass responsible legislation to stop the Bush Administration's obstruction of this vital research. They said that rather than allowing embryos to be thrown away, we should permit them to protect life, and aid those who suffer from Alzheimer's Disease, cancer, Parkinson's, diabetes and many other debilitating and deadly illnesses.

    But that was a long year ago. And since then, Senate Republican leaders have joined with the President to allow right wing partisanship to stand in the way of promising new cures.

    It's time for hope.

    Millions of families are counting on us to make a difference for those who are seriously ill or injured. They want us to support ethical research that offers the promise of longer and fuller lives to their loved ones. A Senate vote is the only thing standing in the way of sending this bill to the President - and yet the Senate Republican leadership continues to stall.

    The promise of stem cell research has gone unfulfilled for too long. Join the DCCC's call for a Senate vote, and bring hope to the American people:

    http://www.dccc.org/get_involved/petitions/stemcell

    The Senate leadership shelved the stem cell bill last year, assuring supporters it would be one of the first items this year to get a vote. Time is running out for those who are clinging to hope that stem cell research will provide the cure they need to extend their lives.

    Strong support by our government is the only way to assure that the highest ethical standards are followed and that lifesaving breakthroughs will be passed on those who need them.

    It's time for the Senate to do the people's business. Sign the DCCC's petition and tell the Republican leadership to stop obstructing stem cell research:

    http://www.dccc.org/get_involved/petitions/stemcell

    There is much to do in the coming weeks, and I look forward to working with you on a broad range of topics. But our goal is clear: bringing hope to the American people by restoring their faith in our government.

    In 2006, we can take back Congress - but until then, we must hold the Republican leadership accountable. Thank you for your participation.

    Sincerely,
    Senator Edward M. Kennedy

    Crisis of the Republic
    by Jonathan Schell, The Nation, March 6, 2006

    Jonathan Schell writes that the imperial presidency of George W. Bush, a misbegotten war and presidential law-breaking at home have put our Republic at mortal risk. Will the Constitution survive? Or are we in the midst of a transmutation in which the balance of powers and our personal freedoms will be canceled?

    .... today the many disparate crises of the past have combined into one general systemic crisis, placing the basic structure of the Republic at mortal risk.   [ read more ]

    Finding a Chemical Harmless, For a Fee
    Environmental Science and Technology, February 22, 2006

    In a April 2003 pitch to DuPont, The Weinberg Group proposed a strategy to help defuse the growing controversy over the health impacts of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a compound used to make Teflon. Weinberg's Vice-President of Product Defense, P.Terrence Gaffney, said, "DuPont must shape the debate at all levels." One of his suggested strategies was to facilitate the "publication of papers and articles dispelling the alleged nexus between PFOA and teratogenicity as well as other claimed harm." (Teratogenicity is used to describe the damaging effects of an agent on a fetus.) Gaffney also proposed to "develop 'blue ribbon panels' of thought leaders on issues related to PFOA" and to "coordinate the publishing of white papers on PFOA, junk science and the limits of medical monitoring." DuPont confirmed to reporter Paul D. Thacker that they had hired the Weinberg Group to help with "scientific third party experts," probably on PFOA issues.

    Website: Environmental Science and Technology, February 22, 2006
    URL: http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2006/feb/business/pt_weinberg.html.

    37 million poor hidden in the land of plenty
    by Paul Harris, Guardian Observer, February 19, 2006

    Americans have always believed that hard work will bring rewards, but vast numbers now cannot meet their bills even with two or three jobs. More than one in 10 citizens live below the poverty line, and the gap between the haves and have-nots is widening. [ read more ]

    Behind the White House’s Billion-Dollar Propaganda Push
    By Michelle Chen, The New Standard, February 15, 2006

    The public-relations gloss that has long wrapped the Bush administration is fast becoming a blemish on the White House, according to lawmakers who have uncovered some $1.6 billion in federal funds spent on promoting various administration-sponsored programs.   [ read more ]

    25 US Reps for Bush Impeachment Probe
    By Matthew Cardinale, Editor, Atlanta Progressive News | February 15, 2006

    APN) ATLANTA–25 US Representatives–including two members of the Georgia delegation–have now signed on as co-sponsors of H. Res 635, demanding a probe which could recommend Bush’s impeachment, including the initial sponsor, US Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), Atlanta Progressive News has learned. [ read more ]
    Note: No Massachusetts congressmen have signed on todate.

    Can You Say "Permanent Bases"? The American Press Can't
    By Tom Engelhardt, Tomdispatch, February 14, 2006

    .... In the case of Iraq, nothing could be more concrete - though less generally discussed in our media - than the set of enormous bases the Pentagon has long been building in that country. Quite literally multi-billions of dollars have gone into them. In a prestigious engineering magazine in late 2003, Lt. Col. David Holt, the Army engineer "tasked with facilities development" in Iraq, was already speaking proudly of several billion dollars being sunk into base construction ("the numbers are staggering"). Since then, the base-building has been massive and ongoing.
    ....
    There are at least four such "super-bases" in Iraq, none of which have anything to do with "withdrawal" from that country. Quite the contrary, these bases are being constructed as little American islands of eternal order in an anarchic sea. Whatever top administration officials and military commanders say - and they always deny that we seek "permanent" bases in Iraq - facts-on-the-ground speak with another voice entirely. These bases practically scream "permanency."   [ read more ]

    War with the Bureaucracy (Fallen Legions III)
    by Keith Gottschalk | February 12, 2006

    In the first installment of this series, I offered 42 names to begin what now seems an endless -- and ever-growing -- list of top officials as well as beleaguered administrators, managers, and career civil servants who quit their government posts in protest or were ridiculed, defamed, threatened, fired, forced out, demoted, or driven to retire by Bush administration strong-arm tactics, cronyism, and disastrous policies. In the second installment, I added what turned out to be a modest 175 further casualties to the rolls of "the Fallen." With this latest installment, TomDispatch's tally of the battling bureaucracy's casualties stands at approximately 243 -- and rising (so please continue to send your suggestions of deserving legionnaires to: fallenlegionwall@yahoo.com).

    Despite this toll, now into the hundreds and counting, it seems that we've barely scratched the surface. In fact, since the last installment, other commentators have increased our knowledge of these folks by digging into what Tom Engelhardt has aptly called the Bush administration's "war with the bureaucracy" -- a battle between the Bush administration and the career civil servants (sometimes even the president's own appointees), who constitute "the only significant check-and-balance in our system since September 11, 2001."   [ read more 

    See Also:
    Fallen Legions I  (Tomgram: Nick Turse, Casualties of the Bush Administration)
    Fallen Legions II  (Tomgram: Nick Turse on Bush's Expanding "Fallen Legion")
    This 12-Step Program Can Break U.S. Oil
    by Michael Brune, Madison Capital Times (Wisconsin), Feb 11, 2006

    The president admitted to a national problem, but stopped well short of committing our country to a full recovery program. We already have the technology. What we desperately need is the courage to act now. It is time for nothing short of a national intervention, and a 12-step program to break America's oil addiction. Here's how: [ Read More ]

    Top 10 'Conspiracy Theories' about George W. Bush
    by Maureen Farrell, February 6, 2006

    With the most secretive, power-hungry administration in recent history, George W. Bush has generated a cornucopia of theories. Many of them are ridiculous while others, like the assorted conspiracies relating to Skull and Bones, simply confirm suspicions about frat boys and prove that privilege and networking do, in fact, catapult people into high places.
    Some theories, however, have Tina Turner-strength legs. For your consideration:.
    [ Part 1 ],    [ Part 2 ]

    Revealed: secret plan to keep UK troops permanently in Iraq
    by BRIAN BRADY, WESTMINSTER EDITOR, Feb 5, 2006

    BRITAIN is laying secret plans to maintain a permanent military presence in Iraq.

    Ministers and military officials are in negotiations with their American counterparts over the British contribution to the long-term effort to maintain peace and stability in post-Saddam Iraq once the country is handed over to its newly elected government.   [read more]

    Two Top Papers Ask: Is the Earth Heading for Doom?
    by Editor & Publishing Staff, January 28, 2006

    NEW YORK While most Americans remain preoccupied with war, terrorism, high gas prices--or the coming Pitt-Jolie baby--an issue that may dwarf all of those concerns receives major attention on the front page of the Sunday editions of The New York Times and The Washington Post.

    One story raises a nightmare global warming scenario for the end of the world, at least as we know it, while the other suggests that the Bush administration doesn't want anyone to know about that.  [  read more ]


    Stop the Gag on Global Warming

    The Political Science Test

      Think tank urges US action now on global warming

    Prepare for Peak Oil Now
    By Richard Heinberg, AlterNet. Posted November 14, 2005.5

    Reality Check: .... imagine pushing your car 20 or 30 miles. That is the service performed for us by a single gallon of gasoline, for which we currently pay $2.65. That gallon of fuel is the energy equivalent of roughly six weeks of hard human labor.

    To avoid the worst-case scenario we must begin today to reduce our dependence on oil.  [ read more ]

    Mineral Levels in Meat and Milk Plummet Over 60 Years
    by Felicity Lawrence, Guardian / UK, Feb 2, 2006

    ...today's agriculture does not allow the soil to enrich itself, but depends on chemical fertilisers that don't replace the wide variety of nutrients plants and humans need. [ see more ]

    What the President Ordered in This Case Was a Crime
    by John Nichols, The Nation Magazine, January 23, 2006

    ,,,,the founders intended for the Congress to question, challenge and constrain the president and his aides so that never again would Americans be subjected to the illegitimate, unwarranted and illegal dictates of a King George

    This mandate, so well-established and so thoroughly grounded in history and tradition, places a particularly high demand on the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. It is in the House, the Constitution tells us, that the work of holding an out-of-control president to account, must begin -- and it is on the Judiciary Committee that the process is initiated.

    ,,,,,

    So far, however, Sensenbrenner has allowed his partisanship to prevent him from even beginning to execute his Constitutional duties.When Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee demanded that the body conduct an inquiry into illegal spying by the Bush administration, Sensenbrenner refused them.

    Because of the consequence of the issues involved, Representative John Conyers (news, bio, voting record), the ranking Democrat on the committee, convened an extraordinary session last week without the official sanction that only the committee chairman can convey.

    ,,,,, 

    Members of Congress who attended the hearing -- Conyers and a half dozen other Democrats -- heard George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley refer to the wiretapping ordered by the president as ''an intelligence operation in search of a legal rationale."Without a doubt, Turley added, ''What the president ordered in this case was a crime," said Turley, who bluntly told the gathering that Sensenbrenner and other House Republicans have set a dangerous precedent by refusing to permit oversight hearings.  [ read more ]

    Investigation of Warrantless Eavesdropping Program Urged
    By Chris Strohm, GovExec.com, Jan 20, 2006

    Legal experts, privacy advocates and Democratic lawmakers on Friday called for congressional and independent investigations into whether the Bush administration broke the law by authorizing a secret program to eavesdrop on U.S. citizens without a court order.
    ....
    Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said he agrees a special counsel is needed. "If you're dealing with what appears to be a criminal conspiracy by the president, the vice president, the attorney general and others, you cannot ask the attorney general and the people under him to fairly investigate," Nadler said. "Obviously, they will dismiss this out of hand because they will not admit how real this is."  [  read more ]

    Congressional Research Office concluded the president broke the law when he authorized spying on Americans
    January 07, 2006
    Boston Globe Online, not published in Boston Globe Print Edition as of Saturday Jan 7th
    BuzzFlash.com reports that the piece was buried on page 9 on Saturday's edition of the Chicago Tribune.

    The report issued on Thursday, January 05, 2006 was delayed past Friday to place it into the non-news weekend period.

    The fact that a paper like the Boston Globe chose not to report and the Chicago Tribune chose to bury an article that confirms that the president broke the law in spying on Americans like us -- and has vowed to continue the illegal program -- is testament to the news bias of the mainstream media.   [read report
    Big Brother Bush: President Steps toward Police State
    Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, December 18, 2005

    Without a serious leap of imagination, particularly with the list of those under surveillance not available to anyone outside the NSA and the Pentagon, it is also possible to project that political critics of the Bush administration could end up among those being tracked. The idea that all of this is being done to us in the name of national security doesn't wash; that is the language of a police state.   [read more]

    The Business of Voting
    New York Times, December 18, 2005

    Diebold has always insisted that its electronic voting machines are so reliable that there is no need for paper records of votes that can be independently verified. Fortunately, the American people feel otherwise.    [read more]

    Oldie but Goodie - Counterinaugural at the Clinton library
    By Sidney Blumenthal, Salon Magazine, Nov. 25, 2004

    At the dedication of the Clinton library, the former president calls for transcending divisions, while the president strangely muses that "a submarine could take this place out."

    When the presidents were announced, the president tried to push his way past Clinton at the library door to be first in line, against the already accepted protocol for the event, as though the walk to the platform was a contest for alpha male.

    On his tour of the library the president appeared distracted and glanced repeatedly at his watch. When he stopped to gaze at the river, where Secret Service agents were stationed in boats, the guide said, "Usually, you might see some bass fishermen out there." The president replied: "A submarine could take this place out."

    At the private luncheon of distinguished guests afterward, in a heated tent pitched behind the library, Shimon Peres delivered a heartfelt toast to Clinton's perseverance in pursuing the Middle East peace process. Upon entering the tent, the president, according to an eyewitness, told an aide, "One gulp and we're out of here." He had informed the Clintons he would stay through the lunch, but by the time Peres arose with wine glass in hand the president was gone.

    Offstage, beforehand, Rove and Bush had had their library tours. According to two eyewitnesses, Rove had shown keen interest in everything he saw, and asked questions, including about costs, obviously thinking about a future Bush library and legacy. "You're not such a scary guy," joked his tour guide. "Yes, I am," Rove replied. Walking away, he muttered deliberately and loudly, "I change Constitutions, I put churches in schools ..."   [  read more ]

    Defense hawk Dicks says he now sees war as a mistake
    by Alicia Mundy, Seattle Times Washington bureau, November 25, 2005

    .... But [Rep. Norm] Dicks says the intelligence was "doctored." And he says the White House didn't plan for and deploy enough troops for the growing insurgency.

    "A lot of us relied on [former CIA director] George Tenet. We had many meetings with the White House and CIA, and they did not tell us there was a dispute between the CIA, Commerce or the Pentagon on the WMDs," he said.

    He and Murtha tended to give the military, the CIA and the White House the benefit of the doubt, Dicks says. But he now says he and his colleagues should have pressed much harder for answers. ....   [  read more ]

    Perhaps Rep. Dicks will also consider supporting Bill H.R.3760, Title: To establish a Department of Peace and Nonviolence.

    The War on Civilization: Destroying the global village to save it

    Tehran Times Opinion Column, Jan. 15, By Hamid Golpira
    ....In 2003, the United States and its allies launched a war on the pretext that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. Today, the only WMD to be found in Iraq is the uranium dust blowing in the breeze from the U.S. military’s depleted uranium weapons. ....  [  read more  ]

    Is Impeachment an Option? Not if the Press has its way

    by Dave Lindorff, www.smirkingchimp.com
    writes on the 'The missing polls, inquiries and bills: How the US press squelches Bush impeachment drive.

    ”There are now eight members of Congress who have put their names to a bill calling for a special committee of the House to investigate impeachable crimes by the Bush administration. To date, all of them are Democrats.

    So far, you'd be hard-pressed to know about any of this--including the very fact that Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), the low-key and soft-spoken but dedicated ranking minority member of the House Judiciary Committee, had even submitted such a bill--as well as two companion bills calling for censure of both Bush and Cheney for abuse of power.

    See H.Res.635, 636, and 637 Bill summaries above in the Annoucements Section [ed.]

    “Apparently in the editorial cloister of our once proud Fourth Estate, where decisions as to what it is safe or appropriate for us in the public to know, it has been determined that we do not need to know that the notion of impeachment of the president is starting to grow.

    “Most of the major corporate media have yet to let the public know that several respected polls have shown a majority of Americans to favor impeachment if the president lied about the reasons for going to war against Iraq, which if combined with polls showing that two-thirds of Americans or more think he did lie about those reasons, tells you all you need to know about the public attitude on impeachment.”

    A (Very Short) Honor Roll of House Members Who Are Standing Up for the Constitution

    by Dave Lindorff, Jan. 13, 2006

    While the representatives who have joined Rep. Conyers in calling for censure and for impeachment investigations of Bush and Cheney, the most remarkable thing about this little list is who is not on it.  [  read more ]

    Alito and the Ken Lay Factor

    by Robert Parry, Consortium News - January 12 2006
    ....The "unitary executive" applies as well to the President's authority to interpret laws as he sees fit, especially in areas of national security where right-wing lawyers argue that the commander-in-chief powers are "plenary," which means "absolute, unqualified."

    So, when Alito assured the Senate Judiciary Committee that no one, not even the President, is "above the law," that palliative answer had little meaning since under the "unitary" theory favored by Alito the President effectively is the law.

    Since his days as a lawyer in Ronald Reagan's White House, Alito has pushed this theory. At a Federalist Society symposium in 2001, Alito recalled that when he was in the Office of Legal Counsel in Ronald Reagan's White House, "we were strong proponents of the theory of the unitary executive, that all federal executive power is vested by the Constitution in the President." ....   [ read more ]

    What Does the Administration Mean When It Refers to the "Unitary Executive"? - [ read more ] in Why the Bush Doctrine Violates the Constitution - The Unitary Executive By Jennifer Van Bergen

    Torture ban still faces political interpretation

    January 08, 2006
    Nothing short of breathtaking: President Bush agreed with great fanfare last month to accept a ban on torture, but he later quietly reserved the right to ignore it, even as he signed it into law.

    Acting from the seclusion of his Texas ranch at the start of New Year’s weekend, the president said he would interpret the new law in keeping with his expansive view of presidential power. He did it by issuing a bill-signing statement — a little-noticed device that has become a favorite tool of presidential power in the Bush White House.

    In fact, the president has used signing statements to reject, revise or put his spin on more than 500 legislative provisions. Experts say he has been far more aggressive than any previous president in using the statements to claim sweeping executive power — and not just on national security issues. “It’s nothing short of breathtaking,” said Phillip Cooper, a professor of public administration at Portland State University. “In every case, the White House has interpreted presidential authority as broadly as possible, interpreted legislative authority as narrowly as possible, and pre-empted the judiciary.”   [  read more ]

    The Cost of The War

    by Pascal Riche | January 5, 2005
    Harvard budget expert Linda Bilmes and Columbia University Professor and Nobel Laureate Joseph E. Stiglitz calculate that the war is likely to cost the United States a minimum of nearly one trillion dollars and potentially over $2 trillion. This is far higher than earlier estimates of $100-200 billion.

    The study expands on traditional budgetary estimates by including costs such as lifetime disability and health care for the over 16,000 injured, one fifth of whom have serious brain or spinal injuries. It then goes on to analyze the costs to the economy, including the economic value of lives lost and the impact of factors such as higher oil prices that can be partly attributed to the conflict in Iraq. The paper also calculates the impact on the economy if a proportion of the money spent on the Iraq war were spent in other ways, including on investments in the United States   [ read more ]

    Racing Toward Climate Disaster
    By Stephen Leahy, IPS | Dec 27, 2005

    .... Meanwhile, several climate research studies released in December show that the impacts of climate change are coming faster than predicted. This suggests that the worst case disaster scenarios may be the most likely unless there is concerted global action to reduce emissions.

    Satellite photos taken this year revealed that there was 20 percent less Arctic sea ice compared to the first pictures taken in 1978, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Centre (NSIDC) in Boulder, Colorado.

    The loss of ice is not too surprising given the four degrees C rise in average winter temperatures in the Arctic. However, the extent and speed with which the Arctic ice is melting is unprecedented. ....   [ read more ]

    See Also:
    Past gives clue to climate impact - BBC News, International Version, 5 Jan 2006
    Now on PBS, Dec 30th

    2006 UNICEF Report

    Click image to view 'The State of the World's Children: 2006' Report

    Children Out of Sight, Out of Mind, Out of Reach
    Balancing on the Peak
    by Judd Legum, Faiz Shakir, Nico Pitney, Amanda Terkel and Payson Schwin, Center for American Progress, December 9, 2005

    No, we're not literally running out of oil -- about a trillion barrels remain beneath the earth. "Rather, the theory of peak oil derives from a simpler but less widely understood question: How fast can the stuff be pumped out of the ground?" In other words, the concern is with "capacity" -- "the amount of oil that can be pumped to the surface on a daily basis." .   [  read more ]

    HELEN THOMAS: JOURNALISTS ARE NOW 'SOUL SEARCHING' AFTER 'PLAYING DEAD' SINCE 9/11
    by Nicholas F. Benton, Falls-Church News Press, December 8, 2005

    Helen Thomas, arguably the nation's best known print journalist and dean of the White House press corps, said that there is a lot of soul searching going on now among news professionals about uncritical coverage since 9/11 of the Bush administration and its policies. [ read more ]

    The End of News?
    by Michael Massing, NY Review of Books, December 1, 2005

    What is going on in the News industry since the 1986 demise of the Fairness Doctrine?  [ read more ]

    An insidious culture of surveillance
    By Thomas Oliphant, Globe Columnist | December 20, 2005

    Over time, however, the inch that government first takes becomes a mile, and that also appears to have been the case, .....
    One powerful piece of evidence that it got out of hand is the fact that surveillance has been government-wide in the last few years. American groups involved in nothing more than traditional protest and activism have been infiltrated and followed, by the FBI red-flagged by military intelligence agencies. There is a culture of surveillance now, not a few carefully limited operations against severe and immediate threats...... [ read more]

    In the Kingdom of the Half-Blind
    by Bill Moyers for the 20th anniversary of the National Security Archive, a non-governmental research institute and library at The George Washington University - December 15, 2005

    ... The Washington Post reports that two years ago six Justice Department attorneys and two analysts wrote a memo stating unequivocally that the Texas Congressional redistricting plan concocted by Tom DeLay violated the Voting Rights Act. Those career professional civil servants were overruled by senior officials, the president’s political appointees, who went ahead and approved the plan anyway.

    We’re only finding this out now because someone leaked the memo. According to The Post, the document was kept under tight wraps and “lawyers who worked on the case were subjected to an unusual gag rule.” Why? Because it is a devastating account of how DeLay allegedly helped launder corporate money to elect a Texas Legislature that then shuffled Congressional districts to add five new Republican members of the House, nailing down control of Congress for the radical right and their corporate pals.
    [read more]






    Mission    Our History    Newsletter    Your Representative    Progressive Links    Contact Us    Home

    Legal Issues     RSS     Top